number_in_month exercise (SML recursive function on list interation)

大兔子大兔子 提交于 2021-01-29 07:39:04

问题


I found this code on another SO post:

fun number_in_month ([], _) = 0
  | number_in_month ((_,x2,_) :: xs, m) = 
    if x2 = m then
    1 + number_in_month(xs, m)
    else
    number_in_month(xs, m)

and to my surprise it works.

- number_in_month ([(2018,1,1),(2018,2,2),(2018,2,3),(2018,3,4),(2018,2,30)],2);
val it = 3 : int

My confusion is first unfamiliarity with this form of classic mathematical recursive function (I'm a beginner), then how it actually steps through the list. My intuition would have the recursive calls in the if-then-else sending the tail of the list, i.e.,

...
1 + number_in_month((tl xs), m)
...

but that doesn't work. How is it iterating through the list with each recursive call? I can only imagine this is baked-in SML magics of some sort.


回答1:


No magic, xs is the tail of the list.

There are two things to understand: lists and pattern matching.

In SML, the list syntax [a, b, c] is just a shorthand for a :: b :: c :: nil, where :: is the (infix) cons constructor. Other than this shorthand, there is nothing magic about lists in SML, they are pre-defined as this type:

datatype 'a list = nil | :: of 'a * 'a list
infixr 5 ::

The latter definition turns :: into a right-associative infix operator of precedence 5.

Secondly, the definition is using pattern matching on the argument. A patten like x::xs matches a (non-empty) list of the same shape, binding x to the head of the list and xs to its tail, corresponding to the definition above. In your function, x furthermore replaced by another pattern itself.

That's all. No magic. This would equally work with a custom list representation:

datatype my_list = empty | cons of (int * int * int) * my_list
infixr 5 cons

fun count (empty, x) = 0
  | count ((_,y,_) cons xs, x) =
    if x = y then 1 + count (xs, x) else count (xs, x)

val test = count ((1,2,3) cons (3,4,5) cons (6,2,7) cons empty, 2)



回答2:


But how could this be changed to, say, build a new list of matches rather than just counting them?

In that case, you want two modifications to your current solution:

  1. You want to change the pattern of your recursive case to one where you can extract the entire date 3-tuple if it matches. Right now you're only extracting the month part for comparison, throwing away the other bits, since you just want to increment a counter in case the month matches.

  2. The result of the function should not be 1 + ..., but rather (x1,x2,x3) :: ....

So a quick fix:

fun dates_of_month ([], _) = []
  | dates_of_month ((year,month,day) :: dates, month1) =
    if month = month1
    then (year,month,day) :: dates_of_month (dates, month1)
    else                     dates_of_month (dates, month1)

I changed ...((_,x2,_) :: xs, m) to ...((x1,x2,x3) :: xs, m)... and it worked, but that seems like a kludge.

Here are Andreas Rossberg's two alternatives spelled out:

Using let-in-end:

fun dates_of_month ([], _) = []
  | dates_of_month (date :: dates, month1) =
    let val (_, month, _) = date
    in
      if month = month1
      then date :: dates_of_month (dates, month1)
      else         dates_of_month (dates, month1)
    end

Using as:

fun dates_of_month ([], _) = []
  | dates_of_month ((date as (_,month,_)) :: dates, month1) =
    if month = month1
    then date :: dates_of_month (dates, month1)
    else         dates_of_month (dates, month1)

And here is a third option that abstracts out the recursion by using a higher-order list combinator:

fun dates_of_month (dates, month1) =
    List.filter (fn (_, month, _) => month = month1) dates


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56204390/number-in-month-exercise-sml-recursive-function-on-list-interation

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!