问题
My website application uses C# COM+ components running under a particular identity to access SQL Server, invoked from classic ASP.
There's also a web service that utilises a \bin DLL in the website application that contains a method to insert some data into the SQL Server database (let's call it MyApp.Database.dll).
From the website front end, I want to be able to provide authenticated users with this same functionality.
I don't want to duplicate code in MyApp.Database.dll within the COM+ component for obvious reasons.
My idea was to utilise the COM+ component from ASP to invoke the MyApp.Database.dll method to access the SQL database using the application credential since the ASP is running as the user and has no access to SQL Server.
Problem I've seem to run into is that although I can reference MyApp.Database.dll in my COM+ component project (under 'References' and 'using MyApp.Database.dll'), when it comes to actually running or debugging the COM+ component, when it tries to invoke the method from MyApp.Database.dll, it tells me 'Could not load files or assembly 'MyApp.Database, Version=3.3.3.11658, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=.....' or one of its dependencies.'
The MyApp.Database.dll is not registered in GAC (trying to avoid this, it's also used by other applications as well), and hasn't had its codebase registered in the registry using regasm (I tried this and still didn't work). The version is correct, and I've placed MyApp.Database.dll in the application folder of the COM+ component.
Am I missing something or is it not possible to do this?
Thanks in advance for your help.
回答1:
This is a common mistaken expectation: just because your .NET COM DLL was found in some given folder (the folder set by the /codebase argument or RegAsm) -- it doesn't mean .NET will look on that folder for anything else.
Generally speaking, it won't. Loading a .NET assemblies via COM interop is a special case. For everything else, assemblies will be loaded in the AppDomain based on the Fusion binding policy for the process - which has nothing to do with where your .NET COM DLL is. The process is actually (depending on your version of IIS) either dllhost.exe, iisexpress.exe or w3wp.exe.
You have a few options.
First, the obvious solution is putting MyApp.Database.dll in the GAC, since .NET always looks there. Sometimes that's the right choice (I've done that and it works). You have declined to do so and you have your reasons; that's Ok.
Second, I believe you can change the binding policy with a web.config file. See here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/823z9h8w(v=vs.110).aspx. Yes, your ASP Classic project can have a web.config. Obviously it has no effect on your ASP Classic scripts, but (depending on the version of IIS), .NET and/or IIS itself use it for configuration. I'm afraid that I can't help you much with this alternative because I've never had to try it before, but you're welcome to explore that option - let me know how it goes.
Third option - my personal choice: You said this DLL is already a web service, right? Just call the functionality with a web service call from your COM DLL. That doesn't require mucking with magic folders, GAC and binding policies. Much cleaner. The only mild complication is tracking in configuration where your web service is located - and I bet you already do that for your database connection anyway, so it shouldn't be hard to add.
If you are curious to know where .NET is looking for the DLL, read up on these guys:
- How to enable assembly bind failure logging (Fusion) in .NET
- http://www.hanselman.com/blog/BackToBasicsUsingFusionLogViewerToDebugObscureLoaderErrors.aspx
- http://www.hanselman.com/blog/MoreOnAssemblyBindingStrongNamingTheGACPublisherPolicyAndDynamicallyLoadedAssemblies.aspx
Good luck, and please let us know what worked for you.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23884750/accessing-a-non-com-visible-dll-method-from-a-com-visible-dll-registered-in-gac