问题
I'm trying to refactor this old code that does not use ExpectedException
so that it does use it:
try {
//...
fail();
} catch (UniformInterfaceException e) {
assertEquals(404, e.getResponse().getStatus());
assertEquals("Could not find facility for aliasScope = DOESNTEXIST", e.getResponse().getEntity(String.class));
}
And I can't figure out how to do this because I don't know how to check the value of e.getResponse().getStatus()
or e.getResponse().getEntity(String.class)
in an ExpectedException
. I do see that ExpectedException
has an expect method that takes a hamcrest Matcher
. Maybe that's the key, but I'm not exactly sure how to use it.
How do I assert that the exception is in the state I want if that state only exists on the concrete exception?
回答1:
The "best" way is a custom matcher like the ones described here: http://java.dzone.com/articles/testing-custom-exceptions
So you would want something like this:
import org.hamcrest.Description;
import org.junit.internal.matchers.TypeSafeMatcher;
public class UniformInterfaceExceptionMatcher extends TypeSafeMatcher<UniformInterfaceException> {
public static UniformInterfaceExceptionMatcher hasStatus(int status) {
return new UniformInterfaceExceptionMatcher(status);
}
private int actualStatus, expectedStatus;
private UniformInterfaceExceptionMatcher(int expectedStatus) {
this.expectedStatus = expectedStatus;
}
@Override
public boolean matchesSafely(final UniformInterfaceException exception) {
actualStatus = exception.getResponse().getStatus();
return expectedStatus == actualStatus;
}
@Override
public void describeTo(Description description) {
description.appendValue(actualStatus)
.appendText(" was found instead of ")
.appendValue(expectedStatus);
}
}
then in your Test code:
@Test
public void someMethodThatThrowsCustomException() {
expectedException.expect(UniformInterfaceException.class);
expectedException.expect(UniformInterfaceExceptionMatcher.hasStatus(404));
....
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22491137/how-can-i-use-junits-expectedexception-to-check-the-state-thats-only-on-a-chil