Some of my options have multiple levels, e.g. of "verbosity". I would like my users to choose between the following two equivalent styles:
// no argument: verbosity of 1
my_program -v
// count the 'v's: verbosity of 4
my_program -vv --something_else XYZ -vv
// specify the value: verbosity of 4
my_program --verbose 3
What is the easiest way of doing this with the Boost program_options library?
This is how I envisage the code being used.
- We use
level_value
in place of the normalprogram_options::value
- pass
option_level<CHAR>(your_value)
whereCHAR
is the short option letter, andyour_value
is the optional level, e.g. verbosity, being supplied
Example
#include <boost/program_options.hpp>
using namespace boost;
using namespace boost::program_options;
int main()
{
unsigned verbosity = 0U;
unsigned something_else = 0U;
options_description desc("options");
desc.add_options()
("verbose,v",
level_value(option_level<'v'>(&verbosity)),
"Print more verbose messages at each additional verbosity level.")
("something_else,s",
value<unsigned>(&something_else);
return 0;
}
Behavior
# verbosity = 7
test_options -vvvvv --something_else 5 -vv
# final verbosity of 3 overrides
test_options -vvvvv --something_else 5 -v 7 -v 3
# no argument always increments: verbosity = 6
test_options -v 3 --verbose 5 -v
Implementation
We need something to hold the level:
//________________________________________________________________________________________
// t_option_level
//________________________________________________________________________________________
struct t_option_level {
public:
unsigned n;
explicit t_option_level(unsigned n_ = 0):n(n_){}
t_option_level& inc(unsigned by = 1){n += by; return *this;}
t_option_level& set(unsigned val){n = val; return *this;}
};
template <typename U>
inline t_option_level* option_level(U* u)
{return reinterpret_cast<t_option_level*>(u);}
The logic to increment or set the value lives in the validator:
#include <boost/program_options.hpp>
#include <boost/program_options/options_description.hpp>
//________________________________________________________________________________________
//
// validate
//________________________________________________________________________________________
template <unsigned SHORT_NAME>
void validate(boost::any& v,
const std::vector<std::string>& values,
t_option_level<SHORT_NAME>* /*target_type*/, int)
{
using namespace boost::program_options;
//
// Get the current value
//
t_option_level<SHORT_NAME> i;
if (!v.empty())
i = boost::any_cast<t_option_level<SHORT_NAME>>(v);
//
// Extract any arguments
//
const std::string& s = validators::get_single_string(values, true);
if (s.empty())
{
v = boost::any(i.inc());
return;
}
char short_name = SHORT_NAME;
// multiple 'values's
if (s == std::string(s.length(), short_name))
{
v = boost::any(i.inc(s.length() + 1));
return;
}
// match number
boost::regex r("^(\\d+)$");
// Do regex match and convert the interesting part to
// int.
boost::smatch what;
if (regex_match(s, what, r))
{
v = boost::any(i.set(boost::lexical_cast<unsigned>(s)));
return;
}
else
{
throw validation_error(validation_error::invalid_option_value, "\"" + s + "\" is not a valid argument.");
}
}
This provides the program_options::value_semantic
override to allow zero or one arguments:
template<class T, class charT = char>
class t_level_value : public boost::program_options::typed_value<T, charT>
{
public:
/** Ctor. The 'store_to' parameter tells where to store
the value when it's known. The parameter can be NULL. */
t_level_value(T* store_to)
: boost::program_options::typed_value<T, charT>(store_to)
{}
unsigned min_tokens() const
{
return 0;
}
unsigned max_tokens() const
{
return 1;
}
};
template<class T>
t_level_value<T>*
level_value(T* v)
{
return new t_level_value<T>(v);
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17093579/specifying-levels-e-g-verbose-using-boost-program-options