Errata for Java Language Specification 3rd Edition

别说谁变了你拦得住时间么 提交于 2019-12-05 13:36:55

The best I can find is the "Maintenance Review of JSR 901 (Java(tm) Language Specification) for Java SE 7".


However, the problems that the OP is concerned about are hardly serious ...

Surely this is a sign of more serious errors in other parts of the given grammar, right?

I'd say "Wrong" on this. An unused production is little more than a typographical / editing error. It makes no difference to the meaning of the Java grammar.


FWIW: Oracle's main JLS page has no mention of the JSR 901 revision effort (which has apparently finished!) and that the link for providing feedback on the JLS is broken.

I have also been burned by problems with the grammar in JLS chapter 18, and by problems elsewhere in the JLS. Although many Java programmers may not be affected by them, these are not trivial problems when you are building a compiler or program analysis tool.

Many of the problems with the JLS have been fixed in the latest version of the JLS ("JLS, Java SE edition" or, informally, "JLS 4th edition"). In particular, chapter 18 (the Java grammar) has been completely revised and reorganized.

You can find the latest JLS at the Java SE Specifications download page (direct link to JLS PDF).

UPDATE Feb 18, 2012: As described at https://blogs.oracle.com/abuckley/en_US/entry/jls7_and_jvms7_online, the Java SE 7 Editions of the Java Language Specification and the JVM Specification are now available at http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/ in both PDF and HTML form.

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!