问题
This is a known error in IE8, look at the last bug here:
http://nicolasgallagher.com/css-typography-experiment/demo/bugs.html
Now, playing a bit with a simple example I found this (test it using IE8):
http://jsfiddle.net/AjCPM/
<div id="target">
<div>div</div>
</div>
#target {
position: relative;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
z-index: 1;
}
#target>div{
background: red; width: 200px; height: 200px;
position: relative;
z-index: 0;
}
#target:before {
top: 0; left: 10%; width: 100%; height: 100%; background: cyan;
content: "after";
position: absolute;
z-index: 10;
}
IE8 renders the cyan rectangle (the :after) below the red rectangle, even when it has lower z-index.
And now the tricky part:
change the z-index for #target>div from 0 to -1 and voilá ! it's solved !
So I solved my problem now using a lot of z-index: -1;
But I don't feel safe with this.
Do you know a better solution?
I'm using the :after pseudoelement because I have a list of products, and I want to add an image to the the item when it has the class 'sold' for example.
I can create in the server or with JS a new html element for that, but I think using :after is the correct semantic solution.
The problem is that I'm a bit paranoid about the :after pseudoelement now, do you think is better to avoid it?
回答1:
To answer your last question first, as long as you don't need to support any browsers that completely lack support for generated content (http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-gencontent) then you shouldn't need to avoid it. However, since you note that this is a known bug, you should be careful about it.
In this specific example, I can think of three different ways to work around the bug. Whether these are useful to you depends on your actual use case.
Use
:after
instead of:before
and remove positioning from the childdiv
: http://jsfiddle.net/AjCPM/24/#target { position: relative; width: 200px; height: 200px; z-index: 1; } #target>div{ background: red; width: 200px; height: 200px; } #target:after { content: "after"; position: absolute; top: 0; left: 10%; width: 100%; height: 100%; background: cyan; z-index: 10; }
Add the after to the child
div
instead of the parent: http://jsfiddle.net/AjCPM/26/#target { position: relative; width: 200px; height: 200px; z-index: 1; } #target>div{ position: relative; background: red; width: 200px; height: 200px; z-index: 0; } #target>div:before{ content: "after"; position: absolute; top: 0; left: 10%; width: 100%; height: 100%; background: cyan; z-index: 10; }
Use a wrapping element (usually because you already have one) to apply the base styling to: http://jsfiddle.net/AjCPM/29/
<div id="target"> <div id="wrap"> <div>div</div> </div> </div> #target { position: relative; width: 200px; height: 200px; z-index: 1; } #wrap>div{ position: relative; background: red; width: 200px; height: 200px; z-index: 0; } #wrap>div:before{ content: "after"; position: absolute; top: 0; left: 10%; width: 100%; height: 100%; background: cyan; z-index: 10; }
Basically, when faced with a difference in interpretation between browsers like this, your best bet is to try to rearrange your approach to find something that works cross-browser.
回答2:
No need to set z-index
es, just make sure you use :after
instead of :before
(demo):
#target {
position: relative;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
#target>div{
background: red;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
#target:after {
content: "after";
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 10%;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: cyan;
}
Since the generated content comes after #target
, it will naturally be stacked above.
BTW Whether a product is "sold" or not is semantic information, and so the correct semantic solution would be to include it in the HTML, rather than adding the image through CSS.
回答3:
A quick note on the :before and :after selectors in IE8: for them to work you need to declare a DOCTYPE. See this W3Schools page. I am guessing you have already done this though.
See the answer to this question if you haven't already (I think you probably have).
Basically, the bottom line is that it's a bug. Your solution of using a z-index
of -1 is not ideal, but then again NO work around for the bug is going to be ideal. I don't think that using a z-index of -1 is something to be overly concerned about, unless it causes issues in your layout. If you are very concerned, then why don't you ONLY target IE8 w/ the fix. For example, you could use a conditional comment like so:
<!--[if IE 8]>
<style>
#target>div{
z-index:-1;
}
</style>
<![endif]-->
Behaviors like the one you are experiencing is one of the reasons many developers despise IE. In many cases, including this one, there is no perfect solution. You could:
- stop using the
:before
and:after
selectors & adjust your HTML/CSS to something that is IE8-friendly. - Use conditional comments or JavaScript to issue a fix that specifically targets IE8
- Keep hacking and try to find another HTML/CSS combo that works -- but chances are it won't be any more ideal than your negative
z-index
solution.
Unfortunately, in many cases there is no such thing as a "semantically correct" cross-browser website.
My two cents is to create an IE8 stylesheet and use the conditional comment I displayed above to load the stylesheet. Within the stylesheet, use the z-index: -1
solution you came up with. Many websites use IE-targeted stylesheets.
回答4:
I use a different method to solve this problem:
The HTML for each product contains a "sold out" banner that can be positioned over the main image. By default the CSS hides this element. If the wrapping "product" DIV contains a class of "soldOut" the CSS will override the default declaration and display the banner.
<div class="product soldOut">
... product html ...
<div class="soldOutBanner"></div>
</div>
CSS:
.soldOutBanner {
display:none
}
.soldOut .soldOutBanner {
display:block;
width:133px;
height:130px;
position:absolute;
top:0px;
right:0px;
z-index:10;
background-image:url(../SoldOut.png);
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8828767/z-index-ie8-bug-on-generated-content-with-after