server-side-includes | 易学教程

Server side includes alternative

阅读更多关于 Server side includes alternative

I have a static site hosted on GitHub Pages which is starting to grow in size. Normally I would use server side includes ( <?php include('path to file'); ?> ) to bring in header, footer and any navigation files. However php doesn't run on GitHub Pages. Is HTML5 embedding which adopts a sort of iFrame technique my only option here? I have seen threads such as this , this , this , this however they do not seem to apply for GitHub pages. Not really ideal. Thanks. Jekyll is a common solution for this. It is a static site generator that allows you to use Liquid templates , and is made to run on

Efficiency for including files of functions (in PHP)

阅读更多关于 Efficiency for including files of functions (in PHP)

If I had a large number of functions would it be better to keep them all in one large file or would it be better to separate them into several files of related functions. By better I mean more efficient for both maintainability and for the server processing the request. For example right now I have all my files in a file named include.php . But would it be wiser to have an include file of includes like: <?php include('/functions/user.php'); include('/functions/admin.php'); include('/functions/content.php'); include('/functions/nav.php'); include('/functions/database.php'); include('/functions

Why SSI condition != || != doesn't work?

阅读更多关于 Why SSI condition != || != doesn't work?

问题 I can't get working this conditional expression  while this one without ! before = works perfect  What's the problem? I get no error simply != doesn't work though || with other condition but works for single condition. 回答1: This is because = and != are hardly the same operator. Note that, by De Morgan's law (which I also explained in this old post

Efficiency for including files of functions (in PHP)

阅读更多关于 Efficiency for including files of functions (in PHP)

问题 If I had a large number of functions would it be better to keep them all in one large file or would it be better to separate them into several files of related functions. By better I mean more efficient for both maintainability and for the server processing the request. For example right now I have all my files in a file named include.php . But would it be wiser to have an include file of includes like: <?php include('/functions/user.php'); include('/functions/admin.php'); include('/functions

Equivalent of include() in HTML

阅读更多关于 Equivalent of include() in HTML

问题 I was wondering wether there is a way to include some html content inside another html using only html? A replacement to PHP\'s <?php include(\"file.php\"); ?> Is this possible? EDIT: This has brought up some confusion, what I needed was \"almost an html tag\" that had the functionality of including a html document in another. 回答1: It cannot be done purely by HTML. (There are iframes, however, but I don't think that qualifies in this case.) It can be done using JavaScript. You get the other