server-side-includes

I am loading .aspx and .ascx files as StreamReader . I want each file to register it's javascript and stylesheet dependencies in some declaration like a <%@ ClientDependency path="~/Scripts/jquery-1.4.1.min.js" %> . Is there an existing convention for doing such a thing? I don't need an implementation, but I don't want to create a new syntax if there is already a way to do it. Also, what are the guidelines for custom <%@ blocks in ASP.NET? Also, please retag this question if you can think of a more appropriate description. Have you considered Google Loader or something like this: Enabling the

Im wondering how the performance of th ESI module is nowadays? I've read some posts on the web that ESI performance on varnish were actually slower than the real thing. Say i had a page with over 3500 esi includes, how would this perform? is esi designed for such usage? We're using Varnish and ESI to embed sub-documents into JSON documents. Basically a response from our app-server looks like this: [ <esi:include src="/station/best_of_80s" />, <esi:include src="/station/herrmerktradio" />, <esi:include src="/station/bluesclub" />, <esi:include src="/station/jazzloft" />, <esi:include src="

I want to include a PHP file in an SHTML file and store the result in a SHTML variable and include different things depending on the result. Example: Assume the PHP script would echo 0/1 in plain text (depending on something like time or something). And then in the SHTML, I'd like to store the output of that PHP file in a SHTML variable. Then if the value stored in that variable is 1, include fileA.html, else include fileB.html. Doesn't sound possible. SHTML uses different methods of parsing the code so I don't think the PHP will run on the page to return a value to the SHTML. Why are you

In IIS 7.5, is it possible to use web.config alone to enable SSI processing for files that have the .html extension? Specifically, I don't want to use the default SSI extension, .shtml . Reason: I don't want to change the extensions. Doing so would lead to broken links in search engine results. Also, my motivation for doing this in web.config is because this is a shared server . Presuming that your hoster has enabled SSI's and delegated Read/Write permissions for handler mappings then this should work: <configuration> <system.webServer> <handlers> <add name="SSINC-html" path="*.html" verb="*"

My question is whether or not using multiple PHP includes() is a bad idea. The only reason I'm asking is because I always hear having too many stylesheets or scripts on a site creates more HTTP requests and slows page loading. I was wondering the same about PHP. The detailed answer: Every CSS or JS file referenced in a web page is actually fetched over the network by the browser, which involves often 100s of milliseconds or more of network latency. Requests to the same server are (by convention, though not mandated) serialized one or two at a time, so these delays stack up. PHP include files,

I can't get working this conditional expression <!--#if expr="$DOCUMENT_NAME!=index.html || $DOCUMENT_NAME!=links.html" --> while this one without ! before = works perfect <!--#if expr="$DOCUMENT_NAME=index.html || $DOCUMENT_NAME=links.html" --> What's the problem? I get no error simply != doesn't work though || with other condition but works for single condition. This is because = and != are hardly the same operator. Note that, by De Morgan's law (which I also explained in this old post ), a != b || c != d is equivalent to a = b && c = d which is never true for x = a && x = b where a != b .