inline-code

问题 According to the wikipedia C++ article C++ is designed to give the programmer choice, even if this makes it possible for the programmer to choose incorrectly. If it is designed this way why there is no standard way to force the compiler to inline something even if I might be wrong? Or I can ask why is inline keyword is just a hint? I think I have no choice here. In the OOP world we call methods on the objects and directly accessing members should be avoided. If we can't force the accessors to

问题 I'm looking for a way to include code as part of a paragraph in DokuWiki like I can by adding backtick escapes in StackOverflow like _so_ . Simply adding <code>bla</code> puts code on it's own line. 回答1: You probably want to use ''%%here is code%%'' . This formats it in monospace ( '' ) and prevents any interpretion of possible wiki markup ( %% ). 回答2: I was able to find an answer to my own question. Add quotes around the in-text code ''like this'' . Simple, short, and works great. 来源： https:

问题 I'm looking for a way to include code as part of a paragraph in DokuWiki like I can by adding backtick escapes in StackOverflow like _so_ . Simply adding <code>bla</code> puts code on it's own line. 回答1: You probably want to use ''%%here is code%%'' . This formats it in monospace ( '' ) and prevents any interpretion of possible wiki markup ( %% ). 回答2: I was able to find an answer to my own question. Add quotes around the in-text code ''like this'' . Simple, short, and works great. 来源： https:

问题 I have a page where I wish to render the following html (a small JS template)- <script type="text/html" id="lightbox-template"> <div id="lightbox-background"></div> <div id="lightbox"><%= content %><div class="bottom"></div></div> </script> However, the Asp.NET preprocessor is picking up on the "<%=" tag and trying to interpret it. I wish to escape this tag to allow it to be rendered, preferably from the template rather than the code behind. Is this possible? I have managed to do this via a

问题 I want a div to get an inline style of the image it wraps around. Pen here: http://codepen.io/stevenmorgan94/pen/xuEwm HTML <div class="box"> <img src="http://placehold.it/250x150" /> </div> JS var img = $(".box > img"); $(".box").css({width:img.width(), height:img.height()}); So jquery get image dimensions, add inline style to .box with the width and height 回答1: jonathan didn't get it right. His solution not about what was asked. Correct one is var img = $(".box > img"); $(".box").css({width

问题 Is something similiar to the following pseduocode possible on server side controls? <asp:Label runat="server" ID="lbl" Text=<%=DateTime.Now.ToString(); %> /> I.e. assigning attributes. 回答1: This will work for databound controls, e.g. <asp:Label runat="server" ID="lbl" Text="<%# DateTime.Now.ToString() %>" /> Then in your code behind, you'll need to call lbl.DataBind() . 回答2: Try this: <asp:Label runat="server" ID="lbl" Text='<%=DateTime.Now.ToString()%>' /> 来源： https://stackoverflow.com

问题 I like to Monkey patch a ASPX website so that I can add stuff to the Page_Load method within a compiled assembly. My first thought was to add a script tag containing a second Page_Load method to the ASPX file like so: <script language="CS" runat="server"> void Page_Load(object sender, System.EventArgs e) { // do some stuff in addition to the original Page_Load method } </script> But it looks like only the Page_Load method from the inline code will be executed and not the one from the original

问题 I run into following code in my project: html: <input type="button" id="addmore" value="Add more" onclick="add_table(this)"/> js: function add_table(elem){ var current_id = jQuery("table.t1:last").attr("id"); First I thought that this code is wrong and I must rewrite it to external code, i.e. jQuery('#addmore)'.click(function add_table(elem){ var current_id = jQuery("table.t1:last").attr("id"); But then I looked at it again and found that this html is more readable - I see which functions

问题 If I want a function to be executed, I prefer doing inline js: <p id="element" onclick="doSomething();">Click me</p> because it is easier to debug. However, I hear people saying not to use inline js, and do: document.getElementById('element').onclick = doSomething; Why is the js event listener recommended? 回答1: Basically it has to do with the whole keep everything separate I believe. So keep HTML/CSS/JS all separate. It makes your HTML tidier and, I think, easier to navigate without. Then

问题 If I want a function to be executed, I prefer doing inline js: <p id="element" onclick="doSomething();">Click me</p> because it is easier to debug. However, I hear people saying not to use inline js, and do: document.getElementById('element').onclick = doSomething; Why is the js event listener recommended? 回答1: Basically it has to do with the whole keep everything separate I believe. So keep HTML/CSS/JS all separate. It makes your HTML tidier and, I think, easier to navigate without. Then