hashbang

What are the pros and cons of using: PathLocationStrategy - the default "HTML 5 pushState" style. HashLocationStrategy - the "hash URL" style. for instance, using HashLocationStrategy will prevent the feature of scrolling to an element by its #ID, but some 3rd party plugins require the HashLocationStrategy or the Hashbang #! in order to work in ajax websites. I would like to know which one offers more for a webapp. Thierry Templier For me the main difference is that the PathLocationStrategy requires a configuration on the server side to all the paths configured in @RouteConfig to be redirected

I have several python scripts which work just fine but one script has (as of this morning) started giving me this error if I try to run it from the bash: : No such file or directory I am able to run the 'broken' script by doing python script_name.py and after looking around a bit the general idea that I picked up was that maybe my line ending of the hashbang got changed (silently) so I looked at the line ending of a working script and a broken script via the :set list option in VI as indicated in this question -> View line-endings in a text file Both files appear to end using the same

Many people have been saying, use pushState rather than hashbang. What I don't understand is, how would you be search-engine friendly without using hashbang? Presumably your pushState content is generated by client-side JavaScript code. The scenario is thusly: I'm on example.com . My user clicks a link: href="example.com/blog" pushState captures the click, updates the URL, grabs a JSON file from somewhere, and creates the listing of blog posts in the content area. With hashbangs, google knows to go to the escaped_fragment URL to get their static content. With pushState, Google just sees

I am trying to set up my Router to use "hashbang" URLs ( #! ). I tried this, but obviously it doesn't work: App.Router.map(function() { this.route("index", { path: "!/" }); this.route("otherState", { path: "!/otherState" }); }); Is this possible to do in Ember? twiz Teddy Zeenny's answer is mostly correct, and registerImplementation seems to be a clean way to implement this. I tried to just edit his answer to make it fully answer the question, but my edit got rejected. Anyway here is the full code to make Ember use hashbang URLs: (function() { var get = Ember.get, set = Ember.set; Ember

Possible Duplicate: What’s the shebang/hashbang (#!) in Facebook and new Twitter URLs for? I was wondering how Twitter works its links. If you look in the source code, you use the links are done like /#!/i/connect or /#!/i/discover, but they don't have a JavaScript function attached to them like load('connect') or something, and that it doesn't require a page reload. It just changes out the page content. I saw this page, but then all of those files would have to exist, and you couldn't just go straight to one of them. I imagine that on Twitter each of those files don't exist, and that it is