editing

Is there a way to *completely* disable Edit and Continue?

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-12-21 08:14:46
问题 I was wondering if there was a way to completely lock my code while debugging it within Visual Studio 2008. The code documents lock automatically when running as 64 bit applications, which I greatly prefer; however, I do most of my coding making add-ins for Excel, which is 32 bit. The result is that even though I target 'AnyCPU', the VS host knows that it is running within a 32 bit process and, therefore, the source code is not locked while the code is running hosted in Visual Studio. I can

Is there a way to *completely* disable Edit and Continue?

◇◆丶佛笑我妖孽 提交于 2019-12-21 08:14:34
问题 I was wondering if there was a way to completely lock my code while debugging it within Visual Studio 2008. The code documents lock automatically when running as 64 bit applications, which I greatly prefer; however, I do most of my coding making add-ins for Excel, which is 32 bit. The result is that even though I target 'AnyCPU', the VS host knows that it is running within a 32 bit process and, therefore, the source code is not locked while the code is running hosted in Visual Studio. I can

Is there a way to *completely* disable Edit and Continue?

拜拜、爱过 提交于 2019-12-21 08:14:30
问题 I was wondering if there was a way to completely lock my code while debugging it within Visual Studio 2008. The code documents lock automatically when running as 64 bit applications, which I greatly prefer; however, I do most of my coding making add-ins for Excel, which is 32 bit. The result is that even though I target 'AnyCPU', the VS host knows that it is running within a 32 bit process and, therefore, the source code is not locked while the code is running hosted in Visual Studio. I can

Removing printer marks from a PDF file [closed]

喜你入骨 提交于 2019-12-21 05:01:12
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 2 years ago . I need to remove the printer marks from a PDF file. I am using Acrobat 9 Professional to open the PDF, but there is no option for removing the printer marks although there is option to add new printer marks. I googled and found that there is a third-party plugin "Enfocus PitStop" which when installed is added to

Detect Start and Stop Editing UITextView

自古美人都是妖i 提交于 2019-12-21 03:08:13
问题 How can I call some code upon entering a UITextView (user taps to edit it) and leaving the view (user taps to leave it)? Appreciate any help. 回答1: http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/uikit/reference/UITextViewDelegate_Protocol/Reference/UITextViewDelegate.html#//apple_ref/occ/intf/UITextViewDelegate Here you can find several useful methods to investigate: textViewDidBeginEditing: textViewDidEndEditing: Moreover to live UITextView you often should implement action that calls

Javascript syntax highlighting in vim

让人想犯罪 __ 提交于 2019-12-20 08:24:08
问题 Has anyone else found VIM's syntax highlighting of Javascript sub-optimal? I'm finding that sometimes I need to scroll around in order to get the syntax highlighting adjusted, as sometimes it mysteriously drops all highlighting. Are there any work-arounds or ways to fix this? I'm using vim 7.1. 回答1: You might like to try this improved Javascript syntax highlighter rather than the one that ships with VIMRUNTIME. 回答2: Well, I've modified Yi Zhao's Javascript Syntax, and added Ajax Keywords

Prevent two users from editing the same data

心不动则不痛 提交于 2019-12-19 08:51:18
问题 I have seen a feature in different web applications including Wordpress (not sure?) that warns a user if he/she opens an article/post/page/whatever from the database, while someone else is editing the same data simultaneously. I would like to implement the same feature in my own application and I have given this a bit of thought. Is the following example a good practice on how to do this? It goes a little something like this: 1) User A enters a the editing page for the mysterious article X.

Rails 3 Edit Multiple Records in a Single Form

人走茶凉 提交于 2019-12-18 10:47:19
问题 I've been stuck on this problem for a couple of days now. I've have some success with Railscasts Episode #198, but that one is for Rails 2. There have been some changes in Rails 3 that make it so the code provided in Episode #198 won't work. The problem lies within the edit_individual.html.erb: Original Code (provided by Ryan @ Railscasts): <% form_tag update_individual_products_path, :method => :put do %> <% for product in @products %> <% fields_for "products[]", product do |f| %> <h2><%=h

Edit in Place CMS Suggestions [closed]

半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2019-12-18 08:59:14
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 7 years ago . I need to find a [very] easy to use (for editors/authors) CMS. Preferably with edit-in-place editing similar to SiteCore. We don't need something as huge and powerful as SiteCore though. Users need the ability to add pages (using set templates that we in development have provided), they also need the ability to

vim line numbers - how to have them on by default?

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-17 21:24:43
问题 I can :set number from within a file I'm editing but how can I have them always be on by default? 回答1: Add set number to your .vimrc file in your home directory. If the .vimrc file is not in your home directory create one with vim .vimrc and add the commands you want at open. Here's a site that explains the vimrc and how to use it. 回答2: To change the default setting to display line numbers in vi/vim: vi ~/.vimrc then add the following line to the file: set number Either we can source ~/.vimrc