Key object in WeakHashMap became weakly reachable. And map should be remove the entry after GC. But a strong reference to the value object remains. Why?
The same behavior is observed with guava weakkeys map.
Expected output:
...
refKey.get = null
refValue.get = null
But I get output:
map.keys = []
map.values = []
map.size = 0
refKey.get = null
refValue.get = (123)
Code:
import java.lang.ref.WeakReference;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.WeakHashMap;
import com.google.common.collect.MapMaker;
public class Test {
static class Number {
final int number;
public Number(int number) { this.number = number; }
public String toString() { return "(" + number + ")"; }
}
static class Key extends Number {
public Key(int number) { super(number); }
}
static class Value extends Number {
public Value(int number) { super(number); }
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
//Map<Key, Value> map = new MapMaker().weakKeys().makeMap();
Map<Key, Value> map = new WeakHashMap<>();
Key key = new Key(1);
Value value = new Value(123);
map.put(key, value);
WeakReference<Key> refKey = new WeakReference<>(key);
WeakReference<Value> refValue = new WeakReference<>(value);
key = null;
value = null;
System.gc();
System.out.println("map.keys = " + map.keySet());
System.out.println("map.values = " + map.values());
System.out.println("map.size = " + map.size());
System.out.println("refKey.get = " + refKey.get());
System.out.println("refValue.get = " + refValue.get());
}
}
UPD:
I tried perform GC in jСonsole and jcmd but output was not changed.
The WeakHashMap
contains Map.Entry
instances which reference the key using a WeakReference
(actually, in OpenJDK / Oracle JDK, it directly extends WeakReference
).
When the GC happens, the entries which now reference absent keys are not magically removed from the map: they're still present until cleared, which is why the value is also still present and has not been collected yet.
In OpenJDK, that happens in expungeStaleEntries()
using a ReferenceQueue
, and that method is called from a number of places:
size()
resize()
getTable()
which is itself called from multiple methods, includingget()
andput()
If you want your value to be garbage collectable, you should interact with the WeakHashMap
, e.g. by asking for its size()
or doing a lookup.
Note that it means the value cannot be collected until a second garbage collection.
If I remember correctly, it works more or less the same way in Guava.
Running this modification of the code and forcing GC in Jconsole confirms removal of the reference.
System.gc();
try {
while (refValue.get() != null) {
System.out.println("map.keys = " + map.keySet());
Thread.sleep(5000);
}
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println("map.keys = " + map.keySet());
System.out.println("map.values = " + map.values());
System.out.println("map.size = " + map.size());
System.out.println("refKey.get = " + refKey.get());
System.out.println("refValue.get = " + refValue.get());
For some reason though, if map.keySet()
is not queried in the loop, it never terminates, that is refValue
does not become null
.
You have no control over GC in java. the VM decides. I've never run across a case where System.gc() is needed. Since a System.gc() call simply SUGGESTS that the VM do a garbage collection and it also does a FULL garbage collection (old and new generations in a multi-generational heap), then it can actually cause MORE cpu cycles to be consumed than necessary.
In jdk 1.7 onwards you can use below command to force gc to run
jcmd <pid> GC.run
Get processid using jps
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34878160/why-weakhashmap-holds-strong-reference-to-value-after-gc