public class Parent {
....
}
public class Child1 extends Parent {
....
public void foo() {
....
}
}
public class Child2 extends Parent {
....
public void foo() {
....
}
}
Here method foo()
only exists in the Child classes and CAN NOT be added to the Parent class (not even abstract method). In this situation when I want to call the foo()
method on obj
which is Parent
class's reference then I need to use intanceof
with multiple if..else
which I want to avoid.
Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
obj.foo();
EDIT: I Need to use type of obj
as Parent
only. Else I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class.
My Solution: The approach that I am thinking is to define an interface say FooInterface
with foo()
method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj
to that interface and call foo() method like this:
if(obj instanceof FooInterface){
((FooInterface)obj).foo();
}
Is there a better approach ? Or any improvement to this one?
The polymorphism is applied on object reference, not a type. When you call
FooInterface obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
obj.foo();
the child class method foo()
is called.
You can't do it with parent object reference until an unless method is declared in parent class/interface itself.
You have to downcast it to child class because parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class other than the contract defined between them.
Here contract
means abstract methods
.
you can try in this way where there is no need to put a check it.
FooInterface sc =new Child1();
sc.foo();
...
interface FooInterface{
void foo();
}
public class Parent {
}
public class Child1 extends Parent implements FooInterface{
public void foo() {
}
}
public class Child2 extends Parent implements FooInterface{
public void foo() {
}
}
The approach that I am finally taking is to define an interface say FooInterface
with foo()
method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj to that interface and call foo()
method like this:
Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
.....
if(obj instanceof FooInterface){
((FooInterface)obj).foo();
}
If you want to typecast only then there is no need of adding interface. You can typecast it to your desired class and call the method. Example
public class HelloWorld {
public static void main(String args[]) throws FileNotFoundException {
SuperClass sc =new Child1();
if(sc instanceof Child1)//Do same for Child2
((Child1)sc).foo();
}
}
class SuperClass {
}
class Child1 extends SuperClass{
public void foo(){
System.out.println("From child1");
}
}
class Child2 extends SuperClass{
public void foo(){
System.out.println("From child2");
}
}
Output : From child1
You could implement an AbstractChild
inheriting from Parent
and then extend this class instead of Parent
:
public class Parent {
....
}
public abstract class AbstractChild extends Parent{
public abstract void foo();
}
public class Child1 extends AbstractChild {
....
public void foo() {
....
}
}
public class Child2 extends AbstractChild {
....
public void foo() {
....
}
}
So you need to only check if your instance is instanceof AbstractChild
.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23490151/calling-method-that-exists-in-child-classes-but-not-in-parent-class