问题
In python, is there a way to make a decorator on an abstract method carry through to the derived implementation(s)?
For example, in
import abc
class Foo(object):
__metaclass__ = abc.ABCMeta
@abc.abstractmethod
@some_decorator
def my_method(self, x):
pass
class SubFoo(Foo):
def my_method(self, x):
print x
SubFoo
's my_method
won't get decorated with some_decorator
as far as I can tell. Is there some way I can make this happen without having to individually decorate each derived class of Foo
?
回答1:
I would code it as two different methods just like in standard method factory pattern description.
https://www.oodesign.com/factory-method-pattern.html
class Foo(object):
__metaclass__ = abc.ABCMeta
@abc.abstractmethod
@some_decorator
def my_method(self, x):
self.child_method()
class SubFoo(Foo):
def child_method(self, x):
print x
回答2:
This is, of course, possible. There is very little that can't be done in Python haha! I'll leave whether it's a good idea up to you...
class MyClass:
def myfunc():
raise NotImplemented()
def __getattribute__(self, name):
if name == "myfunc":
func = getattr(type(self), "myfunc")
return mydecorator(func)
return object.__getattribute__(self, name)
(Not tested for syntax yet, but should give you the idea)
回答3:
My solution would be extending the superclass' method without overriding it.
import abc
class Foo(object):
__metaclass__ = abc.ABCMeta
@abc.abstractmethod
@some_decorator
def my_method(self, x):
pass
class SubFoo(Foo):
def my_method(self, x):
super().my_method(x) #delegating the call to the superclass
print x
回答4:
As far as I know, this is not possible and not a good strategy in Python. Here's more explanation.
According to the abc documentation:
When abstractmethod() is applied in combination with other method descriptors, it should be applied as the innermost decorator, as shown in the following usage examples: ...
In other words, we could write your class like this (Python 3 style):
from abc import ABCMeta, abstractmethod
class AbstractClass(metclass=ABCMeta):
@property
@abstactmethod
def info(self):
pass
But then what? If you derive from AbstractClass
and try to override the info
property without specifying the @property
decorator, that would create a great deal of confusion. Remember that properties (and it's only an example) usually use the same name for their class method, for concision's sake:
class Concrete(AbstractMethod):
@property
def info(self):
return
@info.setter
def info(self, new_info):
new_info
In this context, if you didn't repeat the @property
and @info.setter
decorators, that would create confusion. In Python terms, that won't work either, properties being placed on the class itself, not on the instance. In other words, I guess it could be done, but in the end, it would create confusing code that's not nearly as easy to read as repeating a few decorator lines, in my opinion.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19335436/decorators-on-abstract-methods