What is the most user-friendly way to test the reverse dependencies for a package?

╄→尐↘猪︶ㄣ 提交于 2020-05-27 04:57:56

问题


Testing reverse dependencies is a pain and I find the available implementations buggy, e.g. when I run devtools::revdep_check() I see

Reverse dependency checks for <MY PACKAGE> ==========================================================================
Saving check results in `revdep/checks/`
Saving install results in `revdep/install/`
Computing reverse dependencies... 
Installing dependencies for <MY PACKAGE> to <TEMP DIR>
Installing <MY PACKAGE> to <TEMP DIR>
Error: Command failed (1)

so I tried its to-be successor revdepcheck::revdep_check() to see

── INIT ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Computing revdeps ──
Error in read.dcf(file = tmpf) : cannot open the connection
In addition: Warning message:
In read.dcf(file = tmpf) :
  cannot open compressed file '//C:%5CUsers%5C<MY USER NAME>%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CR-crancache%5CR-crancache%5CCache/cran/src/contrib/PACKAGES', probable reason 'No such file or directory'

Could you give me any simple step-by-step procedure for testing reverse dependencies that works out-of-the-box?

来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46365317/what-is-the-most-user-friendly-way-to-test-the-reverse-dependencies-for-a-packag

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!