问题
How to achieve function Template Overloading for inner template type std::vector<std::vector<T>>
.
I have a program of overloaded templates and a complex data structure having maps, pairs and vectors.
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <map>
#include <utility>
#include <typeinfo>
template<typename Test, template<typename...> class Ref> //#6
struct is_specialization : std::false_type {};
template<template<typename...> class Ref, typename... Args> //#7
struct is_specialization<Ref<Args...>, Ref>: std::true_type {};
template <typename T>
bool f(T& x) // #1
{
std::cout << "body of f\n";
return f(x);
}
template <typename T>
bool f(std::vector<T>& v) // #2
{
std::cout << "body of f for vectors\n";
return true;
}
template<typename T>
typename std::enable_if<is_specialization<typename T::value, std::vector>::value, T>::type
bool f(std::vector<T>& v) // #5
{
std::cout << "body of f for vectors<vectors>\n";
return true;
}
template <typename Key, typename Value>
bool f(const std::pair<Key,Value>& v) // #3
{
std::cout << "body of f for pairs\n";
for(auto& e: v) {
f(e.first);
}
for(auto& e: v) {
f(e.second);
}
return true;
}
template <typename Key, typename Value>
bool f(std::map<Key,Value>& v) // #4
{
std::cout << "body of f for maps\n";
for(auto& e: v) {
f(e.first); // expecting this call goes to #3
}
for(auto& e: v) {
f(e.second);
}
return true;
}
int main() {
std::vector<int> v{1,2};
std::map<std::pair<int,int>,std::vector<std::vector<int>>> m_map = {
{{10,20}, {{5,6},{5,6,7}}},
{{11,22}, {{7,8},{7,8,9}}}
};
f(m_map); // this call goes to #4
}
Always for vectors #2 is getting called, but for std::vectors<std::vector<T>>
I need #5 to get called and also I am getting compilation error w.r.t ::type used in std::enable_if.
Please let me know what is wrong in this program and how to make it work.
Also Can some one explain what does #6 and #7 signify w.r.t template parameter pack, how does it work.
Thanks.
回答1:
The simplest way I see to write a std::vector<std::vector<T>>
specialization for f()
is the following
template<typename T>
bool f (std::vector<std::vector<T>>& v) // #5
{
std::cout << "body of f for vectors<vectors>\n";
return true;
}
This way you have overloaded template f()
function that is more specialized than #2
.
If you want to use SFINAE with your is_specialization
, seems to me that the right way is the following
template <typename T>
typename std::enable_if<is_specialization<T, std::vector>::value, bool>::type
f (std::vector<T> & v) // #5
{
std::cout << "body of f for vectors<vectors>\n";
return true;
}
Unfortunately this version is specialized as version #2
, so when you call f()
with a std::vector<std::vector<T>>
, you get an ambiguity so a compilation error.
To solve this problem you have also to disable the #2
version
template <typename T>
typename std::enable_if<! is_specialization<T, std::vector>::value, bool>::type
f (std::vector<T> & v) // #2
{
std::cout << "body of f for vectors\n";
return true;
}
In your original version... you use typename T::type
... but this gives an error when T
isn't a class with a type
defined.
More: you return two types
template<typename T>
typename std::enable_if<is_specialization<typename T::value,
std::vector>::value, T>::type // <<--- type 1: T
bool f(std::vector<T>& v) // #5
// ^^^^ type2: bool
Using SFINAE this way, the returned type has to be expressed by std::enable_if
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59464774/function-template-overloading-or-specialization-for-inner-template-type-stdvec