Implementing a mix of Promise.all and Promise.settle

问题

I need to implement a version of Promise.all that would take an array of promises and return the result as it usually does, plus also settles all promises, much like Promise.settle does it within the Bluebird library, except I cannot use Bluebird, and have to rely just on the standard promise protocol.

Would that be terribly complicated to implement? Or is it too much to ask here for an idea of how to implement it? I really hope not, so I'm asking, if anyone perhaps implemented it before, to share the idea of how to do it right.

The premise for this is to be able to use it within a database transaction that needs to do commit/rollback once the call has finished, and it cannot have loose promises still trying to resolve outside the transaction call.

EDIT: The link provided to another question is very useful, but it is not a complete answer to the question that was asked. A generic settle is a great example that helped a lot, but it needed to be simplified and wrapped into all logic to fit the transactions scenario described earlier.

回答1:

Building on the generic promiseSettle() function from the other question, you could do this and have both a generic settle() type function and your much more specific version as a wrapper around it. This would give you the generic ability to do lots of .settle() types of behavior and have your own specific flavor and also build other specific flavors as needed:

So, here's the generic promiseSettle() that returns you the state of all the promises and resolves only when all the passed-in promises are done:

function promiseSettle(promises) {
    return new Promise(function(resolve) {
        var remaining = promises.length;
        // place to store results in original order
        var results = new Array(remaining);

        function checkDone() {
            if (--remaining === 0) {
                resolve(results);
            }
        }

        promises.forEach(function(item, index) {
            // check if the array entry is actually a thenable
            if (typeof item.then === "function") {
                item.then(function(value) {
                    // success
                    results[index] = {state: "fulfilled", value: value};
                    checkDone();
                }, function(err) {
                    // reject error
                    results[index] = {state: "rejected", value: err};
                    checkDone();
                });
            } else {
                // not a thenable, just return the item itself
                results[index] = {state: "fulfilled", value: item}
                --remaining;
            }
        });
        // special case for zero promises passed
        if (remaining === 0) {
            resolve(results);
        }
    });
}

And, here's a wrapper on it that gives you your specific behavior:

// Either fulfills with an array of results or
// rejects with the first error, but it does not do either
// until all promises have completed which makes it different than
// promise.all()
function promiseSettleAll(promises) {
    return promiseSettle(promises).then(function(results) {
        for (var i = 0; i < results.length; i++) {
            if (results[i].state !== "fulfilled") {
                // reject with the first error found
                throw results[i].value;
            }
        }
        // all were successful, return just array of values
        return results.map(function(item) {return item.value;});
    });
}

回答2:

I think the solution by jfriend is overly complex because it builds on top of settle, it runs a semaphore and does a lot of weird stuff instead of using the built in primitives like .all.

Instead, if we build on Bluebird's newer reflect primitive (implementing it in native promises) we can get a much cleaner API and implementation:

function reflect(promise){
    return promise.then(x => ({state: "fulfilled", value: x}), // arrows, assume nodejs
                        e => ({state: "rejected" , value: e}));
}

On top of reflect, we can build the other primitives easily:

function settle(promises){
    return Promise.all(promises.map(reflect)); // much cleaner
}

If we want to wait and then resolve/reject based on values it's simply:

function allWait(promises){
    return settle(promises).then(results => {
       var firstFailed = results.find(r => r.state === "rejected");
       if(firstFailed) throw firstFailed.value;
       return results; 
    });
}

回答3:

In the end of all the research, writing, testing and optimizations, it was turned into a library (spex) that focuses on this type of things.

Specifically, method batch is the one that implements the fusion of the logic described.

I am not republishing its source code here, because it now does a lot more than what was originally sought within the question.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32468302/implementing-a-mix-of-promise-all-and-promise-settle

标签

javascript

promise

bluebird