问题
This is my query:
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
PREFIX rs: <http://www.welovethesemanticweb.com/rs#>
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
construct {
?subject0 rs:similarityValue ?similairty0.
?subject1 rs:similarityValue ?similairty1
}
WHERE {
{
?subject0 ?predicate0 ?object0.
rs:Impromptu_No._1 ?predicate0 ?object0.
?predicate0 rs:hasSimilarityValue ?similairty0Helper.
BIND(?similairty0Helper * (4/9) AS ?similairty0)
FILTER (?subject0 != rs:Impromptu_No)
}
union {
?subject1 ?predicate ?object.
?object ?predicate1 ?object1.
?predicate1 rs:hasSimilarityValue ?similairty1Helper.
rs:Impromptu_No._1 ?predicateHelper ?objectHelper.
?objectHelper ?predicate1 ?object1
BIND(?similairty1Helper * (1/9) AS ?similairty1)
FILTER (?subject1 != rs:Impromptu_No._1)
}
}
and the result is:
rs:5th_Symphony
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 .
rs:Polonaise_heroique
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 , 0.17777777777777778e0 , 0.26666666666666666e0 .
rs:Preludes
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 , 0.26666666666666666e0 , 0.17777777777777778e0 .
rs:Requiem_Sequentia
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 .
rs:Le_nozze_di_Figaro
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 .
rs:Symphony_No._29_in_A_major
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 .
rs:Piano_Concerto_No._24
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 .
rs:Impromptu_No._1
rs:similarityValue
0.26666666666666666e0 , 0.17777777777777778e0 .
rs:Sonata_Pathetique
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 .
rs:Dies_Irae
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 .
rs:Piano_Sonata_No._31
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 , 0.26666666666666666e0 .
rs:Violin_Concerto_No._5_in_A_major
rs:similarityValue
0.011111111111111112e0 .
As you see, for each instance, there are many values, I want to aggregate them and make the SUM
of them for each instance. I would do that with SELECT
, but with CONSTRUCT
, I didn't know how to apply the aggregation.
After reading, i found that we can't use the aggregation directly from CONSTRUCT
, but i'd need to use SELECT
and CONSTRUCT
together, it seems i have to use something named "named graph" but i didn't know how to do that even i tried.
your help is highly appreciated.
Many thanks, best regards,
Update 1
One of the ways I've tried is:
construct {
?subject0 rs:similarityValue ?similairty0.
?subject1 rs:similarityValue ?similairty1
}
WHERE {
GRAPH ?g {?subject0 rs:similarityValue ?similairty0}.
{
?subject0 ?predicate0 ?object0.
....
but i got empty results
回答1:
First, it's probably better to make sure that you can select all the information that you're trying to retrieve. It looks like you're aiming for something like this:
prefix rs: <http://www.welovethesemanticweb.com/rs#>
select distinct ?s ?weight ?factor where {
#-- ?x is the special value of interest. This
#-- is pulled out into a VALUES block just for
#-- convenience; there's just one place to change
#-- rs:Impromptu_No._1, now.
values ?x { rs:Impromptu_No._1 }
#-- find ?s which are "one step" away from
#-- a common property/value with ?x, and
#-- take 4/9 as ?weight.
{
?s ?p ?o .
?x ?p ?o .
bind(4/9 as ?weight)
}
union
#-- find ?s which are are "two steps" away from
#-- a common property/value with ?x, and take
#-- 1/9 as ?weight
{
?s ?a ?b . ?b ?p ?o .
?x ?c ?d . ?d ?p ?o .
bind(1/9 as ?weight)
}
#-- get the similarity factor of the property
#-- and make sure that ?s is different from ?x.
?p rs:hasSimilarityValue ?factor .
filter(?s != ?x)
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| s | weight | factor |
=======================================================================================================================
| rs:5th_Symphony | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Dies_Irae | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Le_nozze_di_Figaro | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Piano_Concerto_No._24 | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Piano_Sonata_No._31 | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Piano_Sonata_No._31 | 0.444444444444444444444444 | "0.6"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Polonaise_heroique | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Polonaise_heroique | 0.444444444444444444444444 | "0.4"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Polonaise_heroique | 0.444444444444444444444444 | "0.6"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Preludes | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Preludes | 0.444444444444444444444444 | "0.4"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Preludes | 0.444444444444444444444444 | "0.6"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Requiem_Sequentia | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Sonata_Pathetique | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Symphony_No._29_in_A_major | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
| rs:Violin_Concerto_No._5_in_A_major | 0.111111111111111111111111 | "0.1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double> |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, it seems like after this, you want to group by by the value of ?s and sum the weighted similarities:
select distinct ?s (sum(?weight * ?factor) as ?similarity) where {
values ?x { rs:Impromptu_No._1 }
{
?s ?p ?o .
?x ?p ?o .
bind(4/9 as ?weight)
}
union
{
?s ?a ?b . ?b ?p ?o .
?x ?c ?d . ?d ?p ?o .
bind(1/9 as ?weight)
}
?p rs:hasSimilarityValue ?factor .
filter(?s != ?x)
}
group by ?s
----------------------------------------------------------------
| s | similarity |
================================================================
| rs:5th_Symphony | 0.044444444444444446e0 |
| rs:Piano_Concerto_No._24 | 0.044444444444444446e0 |
| rs:Requiem_Sequentia | 0.044444444444444446e0 |
| rs:Dies_Irae | 0.044444444444444446e0 |
| rs:Piano_Sonata_No._31 | 0.31111111111111117e0 |
| rs:Symphony_No._29_in_A_major | 0.044444444444444446e0 |
| rs:Le_nozze_di_Figaro | 0.044444444444444446e0 |
| rs:Violin_Concerto_No._5_in_A_major | 0.044444444444444446e0 |
| rs:Sonata_Pathetique | 0.044444444444444446e0 |
| rs:Preludes | 0.48888888888888893e0 |
| rs:Polonaise_heroique | 0.48888888888888893e0 |
----------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, since you've got the values that you're looking for, you can now construct the triples that you want:
construct {
?s rs:similarityValue ?similarity
}
where {{
select distinct ?s (sum(?weight * ?factor) as ?similarity) where {
values ?x { rs:Impromptu_No._1 }
{
?s ?p ?o .
?x ?p ?o .
bind(4/9 as ?weight)
}
union
{
?s ?a ?b . ?b ?p ?o .
?x ?c ?d . ?d ?p ?o .
bind(1/9 as ?weight)
}
?p rs:hasSimilarityValue ?factor .
filter(?s != ?x)
}
group by ?s
}}
@prefix : <http://www.semanticweb.org/rs#> .
@prefix rs: <http://www.welovethesemanticweb.com/rs#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
rs:5th_Symphony rs:similarityValue 0.044444444444444446e0 .
rs:Polonaise_heroique
rs:similarityValue 0.48888888888888893e0 .
rs:Preludes rs:similarityValue 0.48888888888888893e0 .
rs:Requiem_Sequentia rs:similarityValue
0.044444444444444446e0 .
rs:Le_nozze_di_Figaro
rs:similarityValue 0.044444444444444446e0 .
rs:Symphony_No._29_in_A_major
rs:similarityValue 0.044444444444444446e0 .
rs:Piano_Concerto_No._24
rs:similarityValue 0.044444444444444446e0 .
rs:Sonata_Pathetique rs:similarityValue
0.044444444444444446e0 .
rs:Dies_Irae rs:similarityValue 0.044444444444444446e0 .
rs:Piano_Sonata_No._31
rs:similarityValue 0.31111111111111117e0 .
rs:Violin_Concerto_No._5_in_A_major
rs:similarityValue 0.044444444444444446e0 .
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35273681/how-to-create-aggregation-on-a-graph-from-construct