问题
Is wordexp on OSX 10.9.5 known to leak memory? And if not, what is wrong with my code?
On my own local machine running OSX 10.10.5 I run my code through Valgrind and get no lost bytes.
No leaks on my Ubuntu Linux machine either.
However, when I turned on valgrind checks on my travis-ci account that uses OSX 10.9.5 I suddenly get a leak from memory allocated inside of wordexp even though I free it using wordfree as the man page describes:
==8968== LEAK SUMMARY:
==8968== definitely lost: 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks
==8968== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==8968== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
OSX 10.9.5 uname
output:
Darwin 13.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.4.0: Sun Aug 17 19:50:11 PDT 2014; root:xnu-2422.115.4~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
OSX 10.9.5 sw_vers
output:
ProductName: Mac OS X
ProductVersion: 10.9.5
BuildVersion: 13F34
OSX 10.9.5 libc version 1197.1.1 otool -L /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib
:
/usr/lib/libSystem.dylib:
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1197.1.1)
OSX 10.10.5 libc version 1213.0.0:
/usr/lib/libSystem.dylib:
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1213.0.0)
Relevant code (Please use the link to the full code below if compiling): https://github.com/JoakimSoderberg/wordexp_test
static void xfree(void *p)
{
void **pp;
assert(p);
pp = (void **)p;
if (*pp)
{
free(*pp);
*pp = NULL;
}
}
char **test_wordexp(const char *cmdline, int *argc)
{
char **argv = NULL;
size_t i;
int ret;
wordexp_t p;
memset(&p, 0, sizeof(p));
// Note! This expands shell variables.
if ((ret = wordexp(cmdline, &p, 0)))
{
fprintf(stderr, "wordexp error %d: '%s'\n", ret, cmdline);
return NULL;
}
*argc = p.we_wordc;
if (!(argv = calloc(*argc, sizeof(char *))))
{
fprintf(stderr, "Out of memory!\n");
goto fail;
}
for (i = 0; i < p.we_wordc; i++)
{
if (!(argv[i] = strdup(p.we_wordv[i])))
{
fprintf(stderr, "Out of memory!\n");
goto fail;
}
}
wordfree(&p);
return argv;
fail:
wordfree(&p);
if (argv)
{
for (i = 0; i < (size_t)*argc; i++)
{
xfree(&argv[i]);
}
free(argv);
}
return NULL;
}
Full code: https://github.com/JoakimSoderberg/wordexp_test
Travis job with failed OSX but successful Linux:
https://travis-ci.org/JoakimSoderberg/wordexp_test/builds/83194932
Exact line of OSX Travis job with leak error:
https://travis-ci.org/JoakimSoderberg/wordexp_test/jobs/83194937#L78
The wordexp
is known on OSX for having used Perl in its implementation. But apparently doesn't any more.
- Perl version
- New verison
Also I did not manage to find the exact source code links that I know is found in the involved libc versions mentioned above.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32897195/is-wordexp-in-libc-on-osx-10-9-5-known-to-leak