问题
Does anyone know of a good .NET library rules library (ideally open-source)? I need something that can do nested logic expressions, e.g., (A AND B) AND (B OR C OR D). I need to do comparisons of object properties, e.g., A.P1 AND B.P1. (Ideally, I could compare any property -- A.P1 AND B.P2).
It should store the rules in a database (I've got a lot of simple configurable logic). And it should have a rule creation/management API. The management tool would have to inspect the instances to determine which properties are available and which constraints exist.
Thanks!
Oh, one more thing. As a rules-engine, I need to include the concept of Actions (Commands). These are what execute when the expression returns:
If (expression.Evaluation) { actions.Execute(); }
So I see a rule as something like:
class Rule
{
Expression Exp;
Actions[] Actions;
Run()
{
if(Exp.Evaluate())
{
foreach(action in Actions)
{
action.Execute();
}
}
}
}
回答1:
Agreeing with will I would say use something from the workflow engine family although not workflow. Examine System.Workflow.Activities.Rules Namespace a little bit - it's supported in .Net 3, and built into .Net3.5. You have everything in hand for free to use like you mentioned :
RuleCondition for conditions , RuleAction for actions
standardized format for describing metacode (CodeDom - CodeExpressions)
you can plugin any kind of complexity into that (to tell the truth except Linq and lambdas and so extension methods of some kind) via TypeProviders
there's a builtin editor for rule editing with intellisense
as the rule is serializable it can be easily persisted
- if you meant to use the rules over a database scheme then via typeprovider it can be implemented too
For a starter : Using rules outside of a workflow
Ps.: we're using it extensively and there're much more in that namespace than you ever imagine -> a complete meta algorithm language
And the most important : it's easy to use - really
回答2:
Here is a class I have used in the past. It evaluates strings just like eval() does in Javascript.
String result = ExpressionEvaluator.EvaluateToString("(2+5) < 8");
All you need to do is construct a string to be evaluated from your business objects and this will take care of all the complicated nested logic etc.
using System;
using System.CodeDom.Compiler;
using System.Globalization;
using System.Reflection;
using Microsoft.JScript;
namespace Common.Rule
{
internal static class ExpressionEvaluator
{
#region static members
private static object _evaluator = GetEvaluator();
private static Type _evaluatorType;
private const string _evaluatorSourceCode =
@"package Evaluator
{
class Evaluator
{
public function Eval(expr : String) : String
{
return eval(expr);
}
}
}";
#endregion
#region static methods
private static object GetEvaluator()
{
CompilerParameters parameters;
parameters = new CompilerParameters();
parameters.GenerateInMemory = true;
JScriptCodeProvider jp = new JScriptCodeProvider();
CompilerResults results = jp.CompileAssemblyFromSource(parameters, _evaluatorSourceCode);
Assembly assembly = results.CompiledAssembly;
_evaluatorType = assembly.GetType("Evaluator.Evaluator");
return Activator.CreateInstance(_evaluatorType);
}
/// <summary>
/// Executes the passed JScript Statement and returns the string representation of the result
/// </summary>
/// <param name="statement">A JScript statement to execute</param>
/// <returns>The string representation of the result of evaluating the passed statement</returns>
public static string EvaluateToString(string statement)
{
object o = EvaluateToObject(statement);
return o.ToString();
}
/// <summary>
/// Executes the passed JScript Statement and returns the result
/// </summary>
/// <param name="statement">A JScript statement to execute</param>
/// <returns>The result of evaluating the passed statement</returns>
public static object EvaluateToObject(string statement)
{
lock (_evaluator)
{
return _evaluatorType.InvokeMember(
"Eval",
BindingFlags.InvokeMethod,
null,
_evaluator,
new object[] { statement },
CultureInfo.CurrentCulture
);
}
}
#endregion
}
}
回答3:
None of the open sourced .NET rules-engine have support for storing rules in the database. The only ones that stored the rules in a database are commercial. I've created some UIs for custom rule engines that run off the database, but this can be non-trivial to implement. That's usually the main reason you won't see that feature for free.
As far as I know, none of them will meet all of your criteria, but here is a list of the ones I know of:
Simplest one is SRE
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdsre/
One with rule management UI is NxBRE
http://www.agilepartner.net/oss/nxbre/
Drools.NET uses JBOSS rules
http://droolsdotnet.codehaus.org/
I personally haven't used any of them, because all of the projects I worked with never wanted to use something built in-house. Most business think that this is pretty easy to do, but end up wasting too much time coding and implementing it. This is one of those areas that the Not Invented Here Syndrome (NIH) rules.
回答4:
Well, since logical expression are just a subset of mathematical expression, you may want to try NCalc - Mathematical Expressions Evaluator for .NET over on CodePlex.
回答5:
The official MS solution for this is Windows Workflow. Although I wouldn't call it "simple", it meets all of your specifications (which would require an extensive framework to meet, anyhow).
回答6:
I've used this http://www.codeproject.com/KB/recipes/Flee.aspx with success in the past. Give it a try.
回答7:
Windows Workflow Foundation does give you a free forward chaining inference engine. And you can use it without the workflow part. Creating and Editing rules is ok for developers.
If you want to have non-programmers edit and maintain the rules you can try out the Rule Manager.
The Rule Manager will generate a working visual studio solution for you. That should get you started rather quickly. Just click on File \ Export and selecte the WFRules format.
回答8:
You can take a look at our product as well at http://www.FlexRule.com
FlexRule is a Business Rule Engine framework with support for three engines; Procedural engine, Inference engine and RuleFlow engine. Its inference engine is a forward chaining inference that uses enhanced implementation of Rete Algorithm.
回答9:
I would look at Windows Workflow. Rules engines and workflow tend to start simple and get progressively more complex. Something like Windows Workflow Foundation is not too difficult to start with and provides room for growth. Here is a post that shows it's not too difficult to get a simple workflow engine going.
回答10:
Maybe check out SmartRules. Its not free, but the interface looks simple enough.
Only know about it because I've used the SmartCode codegen utility from there before.
Here is an example rule from the Website:
BUSINESS RULES IN NATURAL LANGUAGE
Before
If (Customer.Age > 50 && Customer.Status == Status.Active) {
policy.SetDiscount(true, 10%);
}
After (with Smart Rules)
If Customer is older than 50 and
the Customer Status is Active Then
Apply 10 % of Discount
回答11:
You can use a RuEn, an simple open source attribute based Rule Engine created by me:
http://ruen.codeplex.com
回答12:
Try out http://rulesengine.codeplex.com/
It's a C# Open-Source rules engine that works with Expression trees.
回答13:
Have a look at Logician: tutorial/overview on CodeProject
Project: page/source on SourceForge
回答14:
Depending on what you are trying to do using Lambda expressions (and expression trees) can work for this concept. Essentially, you provide an expression as a string that is then compiled on the fly into a lambda expression/expression tree, which you can then execute (evaluate). It's not simple to understand at first, but once you do it's extremely powerful and fairly simple to set up.
回答15:
It's not free, as you can't easily untangle it from its BizTalk parentage, but the Business Rules Engine components of BizTalk are a separate entity from the core BizTalk engine itself, and comprise a very powerful rules engine that includes a rules / policy based GUI. If there was a free version of this it would fit your requirements (buying BizTalk just for the BRE wouldn't really work commercially.)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/208659/looking-for-simple-rules-engine-library-in-net