I need to automate some tasks in Adobe InDesign CS3 from a .NET 4.0 application. I've added a reference to the InDesign Type Library using the Add Reference dialog in Visual Studio. It genereates an interop assembly, which correctly includes all of the interfaces and types declared in the type library. I haven't installed any Adobe SDK, as the type library was available in Visual Studio without installing anything but Adobe InDesign CS3.
The interesting types in the interop assembly for me right now is the interfaces _Application
and Application
, and the class ApplicationClass
. Here is the definition of them, so you can see the relationship between them:
public interface _Application
{
// Lots of properties and methods
}
public interface Application : _Application
{
// Empty
}
public class ApplicationClass : _Application, Application
{
// The same properties and methods as declared in _Application
}
I try to instantiate the COM object like this:
Type oType = Type.GetTypeFromProgID("InDesign.Application.CS3");
if (oType != null)
{
object instance = Activator.CreateInstance(oType);
}
This code succeeds. I get an instance, but of a type called __ComObject
. From what I know, this is completely normal.
Now, here's where the fun begins. For this instance to be usable to me, I should cast it to the correct interface. From other examples on the net, and from the documentation available here, I can see I should cast it to the Application
interface. But if I do that, I get a nasty InvalidCastException
saying that the type System.__ComObject
doesn't support this interface. I get the same exception if I try to cast it to ApplicationClass
or the _Application
interface.
I thought I was perhaps using an incorrect interface, so I tried implementing the utility function listed here. This function loops through all the interfaces declared in the interop assembly and queries the IUnknown interface if it implements the interface.
When I use that function, it returns null, meaning that the instance I get back from CreateInstance
supports none of the interfaces in the interop assembly. Surely, that can't be right!?
However, if I inspect the instance
variable with the Visual Studio Debugger, there's something called "Dynamic View". If I expand that, it lists all the properties for the object and all the properties match the properties from the ApplicationClass
class and the _Application
interface. So I tried using Type.InvokeMember
and that works:
oType.InvokeMember("DoScript", BindingFlags.InvokeMethod, null, instance, oArguments, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
This actually works, but it would be extremely cumbersome to interact with the COM object like this, and I need to do alot of interaction with the COM object, so this is not really usable. I guess I could make a wrapper for the COM objects, but that kind of defeats the purpose of the interop assembly, and I don't want to create 700+ wrapper classes.
I've searched alot, and I've found tutorials and examples of using the InDesign COM object, but they all just cast the instance returned to the Application interface, but as explained, this doesn't work in my case.
I've also tried the following code instead of the code above:
InDesign.Application app = new InDesign.Application();
app.Activate();
The first line succeeds and I get an instance of ApplicationClass
, but when it tries to execute the second line I get a InvalidCastException stating that ApplicationClass
cannot be converted to the interface _Application
.
I'm really cornered up here, and not sure what to try next. I really hope someone more experienced with COM and .NET has an idea of what I could be doing wrong.
Thanks in advance, and sorry for such a long post.
You have to use a Runtime Callable Wrapper
The method you need is this one
Try this :
Type oType = Type.GetTypeFromProgID("InDesign.Application.CS3");
if (oType != null)
{
object instance = Activator.CreateInstance(oType);// or any other way you can get it
Application app =
(Application)System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.CreateWrapperOfType(instance, typeof(ApplicationClass));
}
I didn't work with COM recently but as far I remember (and understood your problem) you can not cast ComObject like this:
Application app = (Application)comObject;
but you should use as operator:
Application = comObject as Application;
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7757255/com-returns-type-that-does-not-implement-any-interface