Is there a way to terminate a java application that uses java3d, without calling System.exit()?

问题

Java3D starts several system threads and doesn't set the isDaemon flag on them. When I dispose the (only) JFrame of my application it won't terminate because these threads are still running.

Calling System.exit() seems to be the only way to terminate the application. (Or killing it from outside, of course).

As I don't like to call System.exit() I have tried the following (but without success):

calling removeAllLocales() on the VirtualUniverse: This terminates most of the threads, but still there is one (named J3D-Renderer-1) remaining.
using reflection to obtain a reference to the the field ThreadGroup rootThreadGroupp in javax.media.j3d.MasterControl and settting isDeamon true on that ThreadGroup. This didn't seem to have any effect.
geting a reference to the ThreadGroup named "Java3D" and calling interrupt() on it: This caused the java3d threads to write InterruptedException to stderr, but nothing else.
locate the sources of the Java3d-core library and propose a patch: I found a repository here: https://github.com/hharrison/java3d-core and here: https://java.net/projects/j3d-core/sources . The later one looks "official" but shows the last change in it happened 5 years ago and the former one looks like a private fork to me.

I am close to giving up and make that call to System.exit(), but I still don't like it. Do you know a better way?

回答1:

One possible solution is to call the Java3dThread.finish() method on the Java3D threads. The drawback is that one has to bypass java access rules to call this method, as it is package-private. This code did the trick for me:

public void dispose() {
    virtualUniverse.removeAllLocales();
    try {
        // give the Java3D threads the chance to terminate peacefully.
        Thread.sleep(250);
    } catch (final InterruptedException e) {
        Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
    }
    // and now handle the threads that didn't take the hint
    finishJava3dThreads();
}

private static void finishJava3dThreads() {
    final Class<?> rendererClass;
    final Method finishMethod;
    try {
        rendererClass = Class.forName("javax.media.j3d.J3dThread");
        finishMethod = rendererClass.getDeclaredMethod("finish");
        finishMethod.setAccessible(true);
    } catch (ClassNotFoundException | NoSuchMethodException | SecurityException e) {
        throw new RuntimeException(e);
    }
    final ThreadGroup[] groups = new ThreadGroup[10];
    final int count = Thread.currentThread().getThreadGroup().getParent().enumerate(groups);
    for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
        final ThreadGroup threadGroup = groups[i];
        if ("Java3D".equals(threadGroup.getName())) {
            threadGroup.setDaemon(true);
            final Thread[] threads = new Thread[threadGroup.activeCount()];
            final int threadCount = threadGroup.enumerate(threads);
            for (int j = 0; j < threadCount; j++) {
                final Thread thread = threads[j];
                if (rendererClass.isInstance(thread)) {
                    try {
                        finishMethod.invoke(thread);
                    } catch (IllegalAccessException | InvocationTargetException e) {
                        throw new RuntimeException(e);
                    }
                }
            }
            Thread.yield();
            threadGroup.interrupt();
        }
    }
}

Where virtualUniverse is the instance of the VirtualUniverse created earlier in the application.

Now I call this dispose() method to terminate Java3D when terminating the application:

   addWindowListener(new WindowAdapter() {
        @Override
        public void windowClosed(final WindowEvent e) {
            plater.dispose();
        }
    });

Where plater is the instance containing the dispose() method from above.

Everything else just disposes the main JFrame:

    actions.put(EXIT_ACTION, new AbstractAction(EXIT_ACTION) {
        @Override
        public void actionPerformed(final ActionEvent e) {
            dispose();
        }
    });

and the default close operation is also set to DISPOSE_ON_CLOSE:

    setDefaultCloseOperation(WindowConstants.DISPOSE_ON_CLOSE);

Not sure if this is the best option, though. (I still prefer it over the System.exit() call, but using reflection in this way is somewhat fragile.)

回答2:

System.exit(0) is correct way to end program.

It's convenient way to handle shutdown in program, where parts of the program can't be aware of each other. Then, if some part wants to quit, he can simply call System.exit(), and the shutdown hooks take care of doing all necessary shutdown tasks such as: closing files, dispose opened windows, and releasing resources.

Read the docu about shutdown hooks.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16470930/is-there-a-way-to-terminate-a-java-application-that-uses-java3d-without-calling

标签

java

java-3d