C++: auto_ptr + forward declaration?

问题

I have a class like this:

class Inner;

class Cont
{
public:
    Cont();
    virtual ~Cont();
private:
    Inner* m_inner;
};

in the .cpp, the constructor creates an instance of Inner with new and the destructor deletes it. This is working pretty well.
Now I want to change this code to use auto_ptr so I write:

class Inner;

class Cont
{
public:
    Cont();
    virtual ~Cont();
private:
    std::auto_ptr<Inner> m_inner;
};

Now, the constructor initialized the auto_ptr and the destructor does nothing.

But it doesn't work. the problem seem to arise when I'm instantiating this class. I get this warning:

warning C4150: deletion of pointer to incomplete type 'Inner'; no destructor called

Well, this is obviously very bad and I understand why it happens, The compiler doesn't know about the d'tor of Inner when instantiating the template of auto_ptr<Inner>

So my question: Is there a way to use auto_ptr with a forward declaration like I did in the version that uses just plain pointers?
Having to #include every class I declare a pointer to is a huge hassle and at times, just impossible. How is this problem usually handled?

回答1:

You need to include the header defining class Inner into the file where Cont::~Cont() implementation is located. This way you still have a forward declaration in teh header defining class Cont and the compiler sees class Inner definition and can call the destructor.

//Cont.h
class Inner; // is defined in Inner.h
class Cont 
{ 
    virtual ~Cont(); 
    std::auto_ptr<Inner> m_inner;
};

// Cont.cpp
#include <Cont.h>
#include <Inner.h>

Cont::~Cont()
{
}

回答2:

Turns out the problem occurs only when I make the c'tor inline. If I put the c'tor in the cpp, after the decleration of Inner everything's ok.

回答3:

You may consider boost::shared_ptr() instead. It has no practical disadvantages instead of performance, and is much more friendly to forward declarations:

boost::shared_ptr<class NeverHeardNameBefore> ptr;

is okay, without extra declarations above.

shared_ptr does more than auto_ptr, such as reference counting, but it should not harm if you don't need it.

回答4:

It seems to be ridiculous but I solved the same issue by adding #include <memory> to the Cont.h file.

回答5:

The forward declaration in the header is ok if you implement the destructor in the cont.cpp file and you include inner.h, as others pointed out.

The problem could be in the use of Cont. In each cpp that uses (and destroys) Cont you have to include cont.h AND inner.h. That solved the problem in my case.

回答6:

This question (deleting object with private destructor) and this question (how to write iscomplete template) may be help you.

回答7:

You aren't technically supposed to instantiate standard library templates with incomplete types, although I know of no implementation where this won't work. In practice, Sharptooth's answer is what I'd recommend also.

There really wasn't anything wrong with using a naked pointer for your impl pointer, as long as you call delete on it in your destructor. You should probably also implement or disable the copy constructor and assignment operator.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1951933/c-auto-ptr-forward-declaration

标签

c++

memory-management

pointers

shared-ptr

auto-ptr