system.diagnostics

As per reference document at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/network-programming/how-to-configure-network-tracing We can setup this in web.config or any other configuration file and we get detailed system.net traces, packets traces for HttpClient calls and any kind of issue in HttpClient calls can be captured in traces, be it certificate, TLS or anything else. However, do we have similar implementation for dotnet core / standard which can be used in both web app or console app/ libraries ? Configuration for dotnet framwork : <configuration> <system.diagnostics> <sources>

I known that the documentation of log4net points out that the logging of caller location information can be very slow and shouldn't be used unless the performance of the software is not affected. And until the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update this was the case. Here is a small example project. app.config <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <configuration> <configSections> <section name="log4net" type="log4net.Config.Log4NetConfigurationSectionHandler,Log4net" /> </configSections> <log4net> <appender name="DefaultAppender" type="log4net.Appender.RollingFileAppender"> <file value="logging.log

Config file: <system.diagnostics> <trace> <listeners> <add name="Console" type="System.Diagnostics.ConsoleTraceListener" initializeData="false"></add> <add name="Text" type="System.Diagnostics.TextWriterTraceListener" initializeData="D:\uat\logs\bifit.log" traceOutputOptions="DateTime"></add> </listeners> </trace> </system.diagnostics> The code: static void Main(string[] args) { try { Trace.WriteLine("Running BiFit Test Server."); } } I can see the text in cosole window. And the file is created, but it empty. I remember there is something like Autoflush property somewhere? You recall correctly

Coming from my "answer" to question "Stopwatch in a Task seems to be additive across all tasks, want to measure just task interval" What are the possible differences between creating a new Stopwatch instance as: Stopwatch timer = System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.StartNew(); with Stopwatch timer = new Stopwatch(); timer.Start(); Implied subquestion: Why was StartNew() method provided? StartNew , create new instance of the stop watch and starts it as well. Simple new is Stopwatch instantiation only. It doesn't start the Stopwatch. For your current code where you are creating a new instance and

I am looking for a simple native .NET error logging solution. I am not interested in using log4net, Elmah or any other logging library. Below is what I am planning on using. My question is performance on my site is paramount and does this flow introduce any performance concerns? Global.asax protected void Application_Start(object sender, EventArgs e) { GlobalFilters.Filters.Add(new HandleExceptionsAttribute()); } Handle Exceptions Attribute: public sealed class HandleExceptionsAttribute : HandleErrorAttribute { private void TraceError(Exception _this) { Trace.TraceError("{0} Exception {1}",

I've been using C# System.Diagnostics.Process to monitor the output of a command line utility. The process I'm monitoring "internally" launches a second process, and as soon as it does, I receive no further output from the process object. What's frustrating, is, if you execute the very same command (that I'm launching with the System.Diagnostics.Process object) with cmd.exe (manually), the console outputs every line I need to be seeing in my C# app! However, if I (for testing purposes) launch cmd.exe with the System.Diagnostics.Process object, and run the command, it still stops outputting at