notify

I'm trying to notify using a button, but both Notification and setLatestEventInfo is deprecated. Two errors: 1.The constructor Notification(int, CharSequence, long) is deprecated Notification notify = new Notification(android.R.drawable.stat_notify_more, "Hello all", System.currentTimeMillis()); 2.The method setLatestEventInfo(Context, CharSequence, CharSequence, PendingIntent) in the type Notification is not applicable for the arguments (Context, CharSequence, CharSequence, Intent) notify.setLatestEventInfo(context, title, details, intent); public class MainActivity extends Activity {

How to solve starvation with notify and notifyall ? If we have 4 threads, waiting to acquire a lock on same obj,and the current thread calls notify() The JVM will select any one thread. Is it possible that thread which called notify() , can again be picked by JVM, as after calling notify() , it would be also in waiting thread list. This might lead to starvation problem if one of the thread is invoked more number of times than others, unless there is some mechanism where longest waiting thread is picked up first. I am assuming here that all threads are of same priority. If thread priorities are

I would like to develop a desktop application with Java (I've got very basic knowledge of Java). It'll run on the client's computer and will pull information from the server hosted in the internet. I can set a schedule task to connect to the server every 2minutes and check for any update/changes but I don't think it's a very good idea. Is there any way to let the clients know about the changes? For example, when every there would a change server will send a notification to the clients to update? The server might a different technology e.g. Java any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks

First, this is a near duplicate of: How to differentiate when wait(long timeout) exit for notify or timeout? But it is a new follow-on question. Having this wait declaration: public final native void wait(long timeout) throws InterruptedException; It could exit by InterruptedException, or by timeout, or because Notify/NotifyAll method was called in another thread, Exception is easy to catch but... My code absolutely needs to know if the exit was from timeout or notify. (In the future, this code needs to be redesigned, but that cannot be done now. So I need to know the reason for the exit from

I am looking in some puzzles for threads and I can't figure out why the following consistently prints 999999 : class Job extends Thread { private Integer number = 0; public void run() { for (int i = 1; i < 1000000; i++) { number++; } } public Integer getNumber() { return number; } } public class Test { public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException { Job thread = new Job(); thread.start(); synchronized (thread) { thread.wait(); } System.out.println(thread.getNumber()); } } There is no notify on the same lock (and spurious wakeup seem to be ignored). If a thread finishes

My question is very similar to this one except that my background process was started from a script. I could be doing something wrong but when I try this simple example: #!/bin/bash set -mb # enable job control and notification sleep 5 & I never receive notification when the sleep background command finishes. However, if I execute the same directly in the terminal, $ set -mb $ sleep 5 & $ [1]+ Done sleep 5 I see the output that I expect. I'm using bash on cygwin. I'm guessing that it might have something to do with where the output is directed, but trying various output redirection, I'm not