nested-if

“if” block without curly braces makes subsequent “else if” nested

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-11-30 06:14:56
AFAIK, if an "if" block is not provided the curly braces then only 1 statement is considered inside it. e.g. if(..) statement_1; statement_2; Irrespective of tabs, only statement_1 is considered inside the if block. Following code doesn't get along with that: int main () { if(false) // outer - if if(false) // nested - if cout << "false false\n"; else if(true) cout << "true\n"; } Above code doesn't print anything. It should have printed "true" . It appears as of the else if is automatically nested inside the outer if block. g++ -Wall issues warning, but that is not the question here. Once you

PHP - Nested IF statements [closed]

橙三吉。 提交于 2019-11-29 12:20:54
问题 I'm wondering when it's a bad idea to use multiple nested IF statements. eg: function change_password($email, $password, $new_password, $confirm_new_password) { if($email && $password && $new_password && $confirm_new_password) { if($new_password == $confirm_new_password) { if(login($email, $password)) { if(set_password($email, $new_password)) { return TRUE; } } } } } This function is used like this: if(!change_password($email, $password, $new_password, $confirm_new_password) { echo 'The form

“if” block without curly braces makes subsequent “else if” nested

可紊 提交于 2019-11-29 05:55:24
问题 AFAIK, if an "if" block is not provided the curly braces then only 1 statement is considered inside it. e.g. if(..) statement_1; statement_2; Irrespective of tabs, only statement_1 is considered inside the if block. Following code doesn't get along with that: int main () { if(false) // outer - if if(false) // nested - if cout << "false false\n"; else if(true) cout << "true\n"; } Above code doesn't print anything. It should have printed "true" . It appears as of the else if is automatically

Is There Anything Like a Templatized Case-Statement

半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2019-11-27 23:47:29
问题 So I have this really ugly code: template <typename T> std::conditional_t<sizeof(T) == sizeof(char), char, conditional_t<sizeof(T) == sizeof(short), short, conditional_t<sizeof(T) == sizeof(long), long, enable_if_t<sizeof(T) == sizeof(long long), long long>>>> foo(T bar){return reinterpret_cast<decltype(foo(bar))>(bar);} I'm using nested conditional_t s to make a case-statement of sorts. Is there something out there that accomplishes this more elegantly or do I need to cook up my own