monkeypatching

To (monkey)patch or not to (monkey)patch, that is the question [closed]

风流意气都作罢 提交于 2019-12-12 09:38:00
问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 7 years ago . I was talking to a colleague about one rather unexpected/undesired behavior of some package we use. Although there is an easy fix (or

How to get the original native browser objects, if they have changed?

夙愿已清 提交于 2019-12-12 09:12:39
问题 Actually the whole issue. Kind of anti-monkey patching. How to get the original objects (Object, Array, Function, String, etc) and their prototypes, if they have changed \ expanded \ deleted? The only option that I see now - it is the dynamic creation of the frame - pulling out of his native objects - Remove the frame on the fly. Perhaps the same can be done with the help Web Workers. But they ie> 9, in which there are no classes DOM, and by itself the same way as the dynamic frame. Example

Monkey patch django.util.cache function

匆匆过客 提交于 2019-12-12 04:14:01
问题 I'm having issues figuring out how to monkey patch a few functions in django.util.cache . I don't want to write my own caching middleware, I just want keys that are a little easier to swallow. The make_key property on cache backends doesn't cut it either for my use case. I've tried adding from django.utils.cache import _generate_cache_key, _generate_cache_header_key from spark_core import middleware _generate_cache_key = middleware._generate_cache_key _generate_cache_header_key = middleware.

How to monkey patch a ruby class inside a method [closed]

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2019-12-12 02:53:29
问题 Closed . This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post. Closed 6 years ago . I am unable to monkey patch a class inside a method body. Within a method definition, I am trying to use a class in two ways: 1] Create an instance and use the orignal definition of a method in the class I am using 2] Monkey patch (pverride) a method in the class and now use an instance with the

Making document.write async

允我心安 提交于 2019-12-11 18:51:18
问题 My recent project is to try and make document.write async , of course this is almost impossible task , many have tried but i can't find any good solution and other than that i would rather try on my own. hooking document.write is quite simple : var oldDocWrite = document.write; document.write = function( content ) { let domparser = new DOMParser().parseFromString(content, 'text/html'), fragBody = document.createDocumentFragment(), fragHead = document.createDocumentFragment(), childNodesBody =

monkeypatching not carrying through class import

非 Y 不嫁゛ 提交于 2019-12-11 12:46:15
问题 I'm trying to test some code using pytest and need to change a function from some module. One of my imports also imports that function, but this is failing when I change the method using monkeypatch . Here is what I have: util.py def foo(): raise ConnectionError # simulate an error return 'bar' something.py from proj import util need_this = util.foo() print(need_this) test_this.py import pytest @pytest.fixture(autouse=True) def fix_foo(monkeypatch): monkeypatch.setattr('proj.something.util

What's a good method for monkey patching Bower packages in Angular?

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2019-12-11 09:44:08
问题 I'm working on an Angular.js project based on ngBoilerplate. I had some environment specific issues that had to be resolved by adding a couple lines to the Angular source. I've got some other teammates who may work on this project, so I want to make sure that when they clone down the repo locally and Bower install, Angular works for them as well. What's a good method for monkey patching my fixes into the app to ensure they'll be available for others? 回答1: Fork the Angular repo, modify it, and

Can Monkey patching replace existing function definition in a class?

回眸只為那壹抹淺笑 提交于 2019-12-11 03:39:07
问题 I know how fierce the SO community is so I'll try my best to keep the question minimal, complete and verifiable. What I simply want to know is can monkey patching be used to replace the definition of an existing function? for example: class A(): def foo(): print '2' def foo(): print '5' A.foo = foo This way doesn't seem to work also as to why I don't just add a new function instead of replacing an existing one, I call these functions in other classes and it is my understanding that monkey

To understand monkey patching in Javascript [closed]

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2019-12-11 00:58:28
问题 Closed . This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post. Closed 3 years ago . I am trying to understand the concept behind how monkey-patch works in JavaScript? I've gone through too many examples but couldn't able to understand For example - Monkey patching the dispatch function in Redux let next = store.dispatch store.dispatch = function dispatchAndLog(action) { console

C# monkey patching - is it possible?

巧了我就是萌 提交于 2019-12-10 19:23:52
问题 Is it possible to write a C# assembly which when loaded will inject a method into a class from another assembly? If yes, will the injected method be available from languages using DLR, like IronPython? namespace IronPython.Runtime { public class Bytes : IList<byte>, ICodeFormattable, IExpressionSerializable { internal byte[] _bytes; //I WANT TO INJECT THIS METHOD public byte[] getbytes() { return _bytes; } } } I need that method, and I would like to avoid recompiling IronPython if possible.