equals-operator

Is there a reason not to use <=> (null safe equals operator) in mysql instead of =?

瘦欲@ 提交于 2019-11-29 17:37:35
问题 MySQL provides a nice operator <=> that works with comparisons that could contain a null such as null <=> null or null <=> 5 etc. giving back intuitive results as many programming languages. Whereas the normal equals operator always just returns null, which catches many new MySQL users such as myself awry. Is there a reason MySQL has both and not JUST the functionality in <=> ? Who really needs an operator that is effectively undefined with built in language types? 回答1: Who really needs an

Does == check for full equality in Booleans? - Java

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-11-29 16:50:47
问题 So I've heard that if I compare 2 strings with == then I will only get true back if they both refer to the same object/instance. That's strings. What about Booleans? 回答1: Does == check for full equality in Booleans? - Java It depends on whether you're talking about Boolean s (the object wrapper, note the capital B ) or boolean s (the primitive, note the lower case b ). If you're talking about Boolean s (the object wrapper), as with all objects, == checks for identity , not equivalence . If

What's wrong with defining operator == but not defining Equals() or GetHashCode()?

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-11-28 09:42:51
For the code below public struct Person { public int ID; public static bool operator ==(Person a, Person b) { return a.Equals(b); } public static bool operator !=(Person a, Person b) { return !a.Equals(b); } } Why does the compiler give me these warnings? What's wrong with not defining the methods below? warning CS0660: 'Person' defines operator == or operator != but does not override Object.Equals(object o) warning CS0661: 'Person' defines operator == or operator != but does not override Object.GetHashCode() EDIT : This answer has been corrected, among other things to note that user-defined

Two '==' equality operators in same 'if' condition are not working as intended

被刻印的时光 ゝ 提交于 2019-11-28 01:51:11
I am trying to establish equality of three equal variables, but the following code is not printing the obvious correct answer which it should print. Can someone explain, how the compiler is parsing the given if(condition) internally? #include<stdio.h> int main() { int i = 123, j = 123, k = 123; if ( i == j == k) printf("Equal\n"); else printf("NOT Equal\n"); return 0; } Output: manav@workstation:~$ gcc -Wall -pedantic calc.c calc.c: In function ‘main’: calc.c:5: warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of ‘==’ manav@workstation:~$ ./a.out NOT Equal manav@workstation:~$ EDIT:

Difference between == operator and Equals() method in C#?

試著忘記壹切 提交于 2019-11-27 23:32:37
What is the difference between == and Equals() with example? I know that == is used to compare operator and Equals() method is used to compare content of string.So i tried // first example string s1 = "a"; string s2 = "a"; Console.Write(a.Equals(s2)); // returns true, but if I assign "b" to s2, // then result will be false // second example string s1 ="a"; string s2 ="a"; Console.Write(s1 == s2); // returns true How this is so? Both are different object references. Suppose we consider that these are reference. But I tried to use like this string s1 = new string("ab"); string s2 = new string(

Should you use 'isEqual' or '=='?

こ雲淡風輕ζ 提交于 2019-11-27 15:44:46
I saw a couple of questions here on SO, with ansers including the function isEqual: instead of the standard == . So far, I have only learned to use the == , so I'm wondering what's better to use, what are the pros and cons of each? When should you use them? Thank you. They do different things; so you need to use the appropriate one: Consider, if you will: NSString *a = @"Hello!"; NSString *b = a; NSString *c = [a mutableCopy]; if (a == b) NSLog(@"This prints"); if (b == c) NSLog(@"This doesn't"); if ([a isEqual:c]) NSLog(@"This does"); In other words; == merely checks if two pointers point to

What needs to be overridden in a struct to ensure equality operates properly?

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2019-11-27 11:37:51
As the title says: do I need to override the == operator? how about the .Equals() method? Anything I'm missing? An example from msdn public struct Complex { double re, im; public override bool Equals(Object obj) { return obj is Complex && this == (Complex)obj; } public override int GetHashCode() { return re.GetHashCode() ^ im.GetHashCode(); } public static bool operator ==(Complex x, Complex y) { return x.re == y.re && x.im == y.im; } public static bool operator !=(Complex x, Complex y) { return !(x == y); } } You should also implement IEquatable<T>. Here is an excerpt from Framework Design

Two '==' equality operators in same 'if' condition are not working as intended

依然范特西╮ 提交于 2019-11-27 04:50:51
问题 I am trying to establish equality of three equal variables, but the following code is not printing the obvious correct answer which it should print. Can someone explain, how the compiler is parsing the given if(condition) internally? #include<stdio.h> int main() { int i = 123, j = 123, k = 123; if ( i == j == k) printf("Equal\n"); else printf("NOT Equal\n"); return 0; } Output: manav@workstation:~$ gcc -Wall -pedantic calc.c calc.c: In function ‘main’: calc.c:5: warning: suggest parentheses

Difference between == operator and Equals() method in C#?

扶醉桌前 提交于 2019-11-27 04:41:28
问题 What is the difference between == and Equals() with example? I know that == is used to compare operator and Equals() method is used to compare content of string.So i tried // first example string s1 = "a"; string s2 = "a"; Console.Write(a.Equals(s2)); // returns true, but if I assign "b" to s2, // then result will be false // second example string s1 ="a"; string s2 ="a"; Console.Write(s1 == s2); // returns true How this is so? Both are different object references. Suppose we consider that

What's wrong with defining operator == but not defining Equals() or GetHashCode()?

让人想犯罪 __ 提交于 2019-11-27 03:08:19
问题 For the code below public struct Person { public int ID; public static bool operator ==(Person a, Person b) { return a.Equals(b); } public static bool operator !=(Person a, Person b) { return !a.Equals(b); } } Why does the compiler give me these warnings? What's wrong with not defining the methods below? warning CS0660: 'Person' defines operator == or operator != but does not override Object.Equals(object o) warning CS0661: 'Person' defines operator == or operator != but does not override