eol

I recently converted a CVS repository to Mercurial. From the looks of it, everything went perfect. Except that every end-of-line character is in Unix style and I want them in Windows style. I know the hg convert command can be used to "convert" a Mercurial repository to a Mercurial repository. Can I use it to do nothing on the repos but fix the line endings? Ry4an Brase How they're stored in the repo isn't terribly important since you do your actual work with the checked out working directory, whose line endings you can control at update time using either of these extensions:

I'm writing a series of SQL statements to a file using python. The template string looks like: store_insert = '\tinsert stores (storenum, ...) values (\'%s\', ...)' I'm writing to the file like so: for line in source: line = line.rstrip() fields = line.split('\t') script.write(store_insert % tuple(fields)) script.write(os.linesep) However, in the resulting output, I see \r\r\n at the end of each line, rather than \r\n as I would expect. Why? \n is converted to os.linesep for files opened in text-mode. So when you write os.linesep to a text-mode file on Windows, you write \r\n , and the \n gets

I have created a text file in Unix environment using Java code. For writing the text file I am using java.io.FileWriter and BufferedWriter . And for newline after each row I am using bw.newLine() method (where bw is object of BufferedWriter ). And I'm sending that text file by attaching in mail from Unix environment itself (automated that using Unix commands). My issue is, after I download the text file from mail in a Windows system, if I opened that text file the data is not properly aligned. newline() character is not working, I think so. I want same text file alignment as it is in Unix

My program can accept data that has newline characters of \n, \r\n or \r (eg Unix, PC or Mac styles) What is the best way to construct a regular expression that will match whatever the encoding is? Alternatively, I could use universal_newline support on input, but now I'm interested to see what the regex would be. The regex I use when I want to be precise is "\r\n?|\n" . When I'm not concerned about consistency or empty lines, I use "[\r\n]+" , I imagine it makes my programs somewhere in the order of 0.2% faster. The pattern can be simplified to \r?\n for a little performance gain, as you