coding-style

问题 I was attempting to mess with the style of a Button , and noticed that my changes were making the button look strange. To make sure I was doing the right thing, I tried doing what I thought would be semantically a no-op: button.set_style(button.get_style()) However, the button style changes dramatically after this line. I'm on Windows 7. Without this line, it looks like a regular windows 7 button - rounded, nice gradient, light-blue on highlight, etc. After the line, it looks like an ugly old

问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 2 years ago . There are a lot of former Java developers at my company who use camel casing in C# for both of these. What casing is most widely accepted / used for C#? 回答1: Here is the Microsoft Conventions Here is the full MSDN conventions And here are the internal guidelines via Brad

问题 I'm a fairly new C++ programmer and I would like to hear the arguments for and against naming parameters within the class declaration. Here's an example: Student.h #ifndef STUDENT_H_ #define STUDENT_H_ #include <string> using namespace std; class Student { private: string name; unsigned int age; float height, GPA; public: Student(string, unsigned int, float, float); void setAge(unsigned int); }; #endif /*STUDENT_H_*/ vs. #ifndef STUDENT_H_ #define STUDENT_H_ #include <string> class Student {

问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 6 years ago . I want to refactor this mumbo jumbo of a method to make it more readible, it has way to many nested IF's for my liking. How would you refactor this? public static void HandleUploadedFile(string filename) { try { if(IsValidFileFormat(filename) { int folderID =

问题 I got easily confused by jQuery's coding style. So many brackets, incline functions and nests in nests. How can I change my coding style to improve this? Any great examples to show this?? 回答1: Check out the excellent jQuery coding standards series here: jQuery Coding Standards 回答2: CoffeeScript is a little language that compiles into JavaScript. Underneath all of those embarrassing braces and semicolons, JavaScript has always had a gorgeous object model at its heart. CoffeeScript is an

问题 I got easily confused by jQuery's coding style. So many brackets, incline functions and nests in nests. How can I change my coding style to improve this? Any great examples to show this?? 回答1: Check out the excellent jQuery coding standards series here: jQuery Coding Standards 回答2: CoffeeScript is a little language that compiles into JavaScript. Underneath all of those embarrassing braces and semicolons, JavaScript has always had a gorgeous object model at its heart. CoffeeScript is an

问题 I'm working with a group of other programmers on an open source project built using C++ and Qt. Now, we need a naming convention for widgets (and other variables generally) to use it as a standard in all of our code so that, the code gets better readability and we get better coordination between programmers. Any advice? EDIT: Am not talking about naming new classes, instead I am talking about naming instances of Qt Widgets, let's say I have a text edit for user name, should I name it

问题 I need to comment massive amounts of information in only a handful of files, and when I look around Google and here at SO, I continue to find results matching coding standards , when I need commenting standards. My coding matches most coding standards except not when it comes to commenting. Could someone please provide examples for the following? <? // beginning of file comments require( 'filename.php' ); // require or include, with filename public class Test { } // class without constructor

问题 There is one problem bothering me in Golang. Say I have 2 structs: type Dog struct { Name string Breed string Age int } type Cat struct { Name string FavoriteFood string Age int } And when I try to sort []*Dog and []*Cat by Age , I have to define 2 different sort struct like: type SortCat []*Cat func (c SortCat) Len() int {//..} func (c SortCat) Swap(i, j int) {//..} func (c SortCat) Less(i, j int) bool {//..} type SortDog []*Dog func (c SortDog) Len() int {//..} func (c SortDog) Swap(i, j

问题 I have this condition if(Model.Bids != null && Model.Bids.Items != null && Model.Bids.Items.Count > 0) { ... } Problem is, I think this is ugly. I could write a function that encapsulates this but I wonder if there is something else that would help me write something like just the important bits below without having to do the null checks. If not then this would be a handy language extension. if(Model.Bids.Items.Count > 0) { ... } 回答1: For c# this two options achieve sort of what you want but