I am currently writing a package using reference classes. I have come across an issue which from reading various sources:
Method initialisation in R reference classes
Can't reliably use RefClass methods in Snowfall
I gather is caused because reference methods are not all copied to every object in the class rather they are copied when first accessed.
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2011-June/061261.html
As an example define:
test <- setRefClass("TEST",
fields = list( a = "numeric"),
methods = list(
addone = function(){
a <<- a+1
},
initialize = function(){
a <<- 1
}
)
)
example <- test$new()
So example is a new object of class TEST
. Typing example$
and tabbing in the
console gives
> example$
# example$.->a example$.refClassDef example$.self
# example$a example$initialize
so the method addone
is not presented as an option. It is available to
call however:
example$addone()
Now tabbing again reveals
# >
# > example
# Reference class object of class "TEST"
# Field "a":
# [1] 2
# > example$
# example$.->a example$.refClassDef example$.self
# example$a example$addone example$field
# example$initialize example$show
so now addone
and field
and show
are presented as options.
Martin Morgan advises to force definition of the methods in one of the above links. This works well
test <- setRefClass("TEST",
fields = list( a = "numeric"),
methods = list(
addone = function(){
a <<- a+1
},
initialize = function(){
a <<- 1
.self$addone #force definition
}
)
)
example <- test$new()
so now tabbing gives:
# > example$
# example$.->a example$.refClassDef example$.self
# example$a example$addone example$initialize
Some of my classes have over 30 methods so I would like to do this as succintly as possible. I have defined:
test <- setRefClass("TEST",
fields = list( a = "numeric"),
methods = list(
addone = function(){
a <<- a+1
},
initialize = function(){
a <<- 1
eval(parse(text=paste0('.self$',ls(test$def@refMethods))))
}
)
)
example <- test$new()
tabbing now gives:
# > example$
# example$.->a example$.refClassDef example$.self
# example$a example$addone example$callSuper
# example$copy example$export example$field
# example$getClass example$getRefClass example$import
# example$initFields example$initialize example$show
# example$trace example$untrace
Whilst this works it feels a bit clumsy. Also test$def@refMethods
is used rather then getRefClass("TEST")$def@refMethods
so that
feels a bit wrong. Has anyone dealt with this issue before.
Is there a better way to approach a solution? Thanks for any advice and apologies if the question is overly drawn out.
I wonder what your objective is? Function names showing up with tab completion? Then it's worth a post to the R-devel mailing list with a feature request. The original scenario is more elegantly handled with usingMethods
as documented on ?setRefClass
. A continued hack might be
initialize = function(...) {
methods <- getRefClass(class(.self))$methods()
eval(parse(text=paste0(".self$", methods)))
callSuper(...)
}
Tab completions can be customized via .DollarNames
in the utils
package, so
.DollarNames.TEST <- function(x, pattern)
grep(pattern, getRefClass(class(x))$methods(), value=TRUE)
Maybe an S3 method could be written at the base of your class hierarchy for this?
I know this is an old question but it is still the top entry when searching for refClass tab completion on google, so I'll just add an update:
Instead of using grep in the .DollarNames function as suggested by Martin, use findMatches from the utils package as it plays better with the different Rgui's around (grep will delete your partially typed name upon hitting tab)
.DollarNames.TEST <- function(x, pattern){
utils:::findMatches(pattern, getRefClass(class(x))$methods())
}
This is also how tab completion is handled internally for lists and data.frames
@Martin Morgan noted that this was termed tab completion. The package rcompletion
and later rcompgen
were tasked with achieving this. They have been now moved to utils
.
I looked thru the code for completion.R
and from what I could determine utils:::.DollarNames.environment
was handling tab completion for reference classes.
Redefining the function seemed to achieve tab completion:
assignInNamespace( x = ".DollarNames.environment",
function(x, pattern = "") {
y <- NULL
if(isS4(x) && !is.null(x[['.refClassDef']])){
if(.hasSlot(x$.refClassDef,'refMethods')){
y<-x$.refClassDef@refMethods
y<-ls(y, all.names = TRUE, pattern = pattern)
}
}
x<-ls(x, all.names = TRUE, pattern = pattern)
unique(c(x,y))
}
,ns = "utils")
Some things to note:
I would only use this for my own use. Currently I am debugging and documenting a package. I had some longish method names and couldnt remember exactly what they were so tab completion will help greatly.
Usage of
assignInNamespace
in a package is frowned upon (if not banned) see?assignInNamespace
.Forced definition of methods is more advisable.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12543166/reference-classes-tab-completion-and-forced-method-definition