问题
What is the right way to define a function that receives a int->int
lambda parameter by reference?
void f(std::function< int(int) >& lambda);
or
void f(auto& lambda);
I'm not sure the last form is even legal syntax.
Are there other ways to define a lambda parameter?
回答1:
You cannot have an auto
parameter. You basically have two options:
Option #1: Use std::function
as you have shown.
Option #2: Use a template parameter:
template<typename F>
void f(F &lambda) { /* ... */}
Option #2 may, in some cases, be more efficient, as it can avoid a potential heap allocation for the embedded lambda function object, but is only possible if f
can be placed in a header as a template function. It may also increase compile times and I-cache footprint, as can any template. Note that it may have no effect as well, as if the lambda function object is small enough it may be represented inline in the std::function
object.
回答2:
I would use template
as:
template<typename Functor>
void f(Functor functor)
{
cout << functor(10) << endl;
}
int g(int x)
{
return x * x;
}
int main()
{
auto lambda = [] (int x) { cout << x * 50 << endl; return x * 100; };
f(lambda); //pass lambda
f(g); //pass function
}
Output:
500
1000
100
Demo : http://www.ideone.com/EayVq
回答3:
I know it's been 7 years, but here's a way nobody else mentioned:
void foo(void (*f)(int)){
std::cout<<"foo"<<std::endl;
f(1); // calls lambda which takes an int and returns void
}
int main(){
foo([](int a){std::cout<<"lambda "<<a<<std::endl;});
}
Which outputs:
foo
lambda 1
No need for templates or std::function
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6458612/c0x-proper-way-to-receive-a-lambda-as-parameter-by-reference