I am porting some code from Matlab to C++.
In Matlab
format long
D = 0.689655172413793 (this is 1.0 / 1.45)
E = 2600 / D
// I get E = 3.770000000000e+03
In C++
double D = 0.68965517241379315; //(this is 1.0 / 1.45)
double E = 2600 / D;
//I get E = 3769.9999999999995
It is a problem for me because in both cases I have to do rounding down to 0 (Matlab's fix), and in the first case (Matlab) is becomes 3770, whereas in the second case (C++) it becomes 3769.
I realise that it is because of the two additional least significant digits "15" in the C++ case. Given that Matlab seems to only store up to 15 significant digits of precision in double precision (as shown above - 0.689655172413793), how can I effectively tell C++ to ignore the "15" at the back?
All calculations are done in double precision.
You got confused by the different ways C++ and MATLAB are printing double values. MATLAB's format long
only prints 15 significant digits while C++ prints 17 significant digits. Internally both use the same numbers: IEEE 754 64 bit floating point numbers. To reproduce the C++-behaviour in MATLAB, I defined a anonymous function disp17
which prints numbers with 17 significant digits:
>> disp17=@(x)(disp(num2str(x,17)))
disp17 =
@(x)(disp(num2str(x,17)))
>> 1.0 / 1.45
ans =
0.689655172413793
>> disp17(1.0 / 1.45)
0.68965517241379315
You see the result in MATLAB and C++ is the same, they just print a different number of digits. If you now continue in both programming languages with the same constant, you get the same result.
>> D = 0.68965517241379315 %17 digits, enough to represent a double.
D =
0.689655172413793
>> ans = 2600 / D %Result looks wrong
ans =
3.770000000000000e+03
>> disp17(2600 / D) %But displaying 17 digits it is the same.
3769.9999999999995
The background for printing 17 or 15 digits:
- A double requires 17 significant digits to be stored without precision loss, which is what C prints.
- For up to 15 digits any number can be converted from string to double to string and results back in the original number, which is what MATLAB does.
If I understand what you are trying to achieve, using ceil
function might help:
ans = ceil(ans); /* smallest integral value that is not less than ans. */
// now ans in C++ is also be 3970.
Here is usage reference.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35624419/matlab-vs-c-double-precision