问题
Our application has set of complex form wizards. To avoid code duplication I created several mixins.
The problem is that PyCharm highlights mixin methods with Unresolved attribute refference
error.
This is correct as object
does not have such methods. But I know that this mixin will be used only with special classes. Is there any way to tell this info to PyCharm?
For now I use such approach:
class MyMixin(object):
def get_context_data(self, **kwargs):
assert isinstance(self, (ClassToBeExtended, MyMixin))
# super.get_context_data is still highlighter,
# as super is considered as object
context = super(MyMixin, self).get_context_data(**kwargs)
context.update(self.get_preview_context())
return context
def get_preview_context(self):
# without this line PyCharm highlights the self.initial_data
assert isinstance(self, (ClassToBeExtended, MyMixin))
return {'needs': (self.initial_data['needs']
if 'type' not in self.initial_data
else '%(needs)s %(type)s' % self.initial_data)}
While this works for some cases like autocomplete for self.
, it fails for other cases like super
. Is there a better approach to achieve the desired behavior?
P.S.: I know that I can disable reference check for specific name or whole class, but I don't want to do this as it will not help in typo checks and autocomplete.
回答1:
You can type-hint to PyCharm what kind of classes to expect.
class DictMixin(object):
def megamethod(
self, # type: dict
key
):
return self.get(key)
It's still not quite comparable to other type handling.
PyCharm is lazy in evaluating it, and only does so when first working on self
.
Things are a bit tricky when accessing attributes of the mixin as well - self, # type: dict | DictMixin
works for one of my classes, but not in my test code.
In python 3.5, you should be able to use # type: typing.Union[dict, DictMixin].
回答2:
If you are creating Mixin, for, let's say ClassSub, which is subclass of ClassSuper, you can implement Mixins this way:
class Mixin1(ClassSuper):
pass
class Mixin2(ClassSuper):
pass
and then use them like:
class ClassSub(Mixin1, Mixin2):
pass
That way I use some mixins for models in Django. Also, django-extensions uses similar pattern (gives models that are actually mixins). Basically, this way you don't have to inherit ClassSuper
, because it's "included" in every of your mixins.
Most important - PyCharm works like a charm this way.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33956505/get-pycharm-to-know-what-classes-are-mixin-for