问题
From the Grails belongsTo documentation, what is the use of
class Book {
static belongsTo = Author
}
What is the impact of cascading operations on Book, when CRUD operations performed on Author?
EDIT:
Thanks for your responses, may be i didn't specify my question correctly. I would like to know the difference between
static belongsTo [author:Author]
vs
static belongsTo = Author
回答1:
belongsTo
is helpful if you need a reference back to the owning object. In this case it is likely that an Author
has many Book
s. But maybe you're using a book object and want to mention that book instance's Author
. That is a good way to get it.
As far as CRUD goes, deleting or updating the book will not do anything to the Author
, but deleting the Author
will delete the Book
. If you don't add belongsTo
then there will be no cascading saves/updates/deletes, you will have to do it manually.
Example:
def a = new Author(name: 'J.K. Rawling')
a.addToBooks(new Book(title: 'Harry Potter 1'))
a.addToBooks(new Book(title: 'Harry Potter 2'))
a.save() // Saves author and book instances
a.delete() // Author and both books are deleted
Edit:
The OP updated their question, and I'm honestly not sure what the answer would be. Hopefully Burt Beckwith will show up soon! Good question, OP.
回答2:
Both ways offer cascading effects in the same way. Their only difference is that in the former case you'll have a reference to author in Book
object whereas you don't in the latter. That is:
You can say Book b = new Book(); b.author
in the second case.
回答3:
In addition to Grantmc:
belongsTo practically marks an embedded kind of relation between the two, this is why all operations are cascaded automatically when this is used.
Without belongsTo you need to manually define cascades (if you want anycascades at al for your relatoinship)
回答4:
It seems confusing and extra effort to me it was since I can achieve same result on the relationship by just simply using one hasMany
and ignore belongsTo
, but you need to make let say Author
class variable in Book
Domain/Class
class Author {
static hasMany = [books: Book]
}
class Book {
Author author //can have only one Instance to be saved at a time
}
But the reason you use belongsTo
is it is enforcing the relationship to follow the path from Author
to Book
when inserting data, keeping a perfect way of governing the relationship using belongsTo
. If you don't specify it as class variable or use belongsto
Grails is not going to understand the two way relationship at all.
回答5:
As the doc says, it is the same to do belongsTo = [author:Author] than belongsTo = Autor, both will create a property called author referencing the "father" object.
Saludos
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21593218/explain-belongsto-in-grails