问题
I have the following function as part of a large codebase, which I inherited:
function = save_function(fpath, a,b,c)
save(fpath, 'a', 'b', 'c')
end
This function is called at the end of one script, before another script is to be executed. This way, the variable names are properly saved (bad design, I know - I didn't write this code).
Now, I am making changes to the codebase, and realize that I need to store more variables in fpath
. I face two options:
- Edit
save_function
to accept more inputs. This would break any other code in the codebase that also uses this function - Write a
save_function2(a, b, c, d, e, ...)
that I will call in the code that I change. This seems like bad design as well.
What I would ideally like to do, is to allow save_function
to take in any number of arguments at a time, and save them all by the variable names that are passed in.
Having done some googling, I found eval
and eval_in
, which evaluate strings as matlab code. However, there are two problems with using this:
- Using
eval
is horribly slow and quite dangerous - I don't always know the types of my variables beforehand, so I can't create an elegant, generic
to_string
function
In order to combat the flexible number of variables, I decided to use varargin
and inputname
as follows:
function = save_function(fpath, varargin)
names = {}
for i=1:size(varargin,1)
names{i} = inputname(i+1); % have to offset by 1 to account for fpath
end
save(fpath, names{:});
end
Unfortunately, since the input variables are held in varargin
, they do not exist as their variable names on the stack, so the save
line fails
How can I dynamically create these variables on the stack, with their variable names?
回答1:
You can use a structure to dynamically define saved variable names.
This option is documented here.
function save_function( fpath, varargin )
for ii = 1:numel( varargin )
st.( inputname(ii+1) ) = varargin{ii};
end
save( fpath, '-struct', 'st' );
As a rule of thumb, structure with dynamic field names is often better than eval
or assignin
when it comes to dynamic variable names.
PS,
It is best not to use i as variable name in Matlab.
回答2:
The trick is to use assignin
, which takes a workspace, a variable name, and some data. It then creates, in the specified workspace, a variable with the given name, whose value is the data:
assignin(workspace, varname, value)
The workspace identifier can be either 'caller'
or 'base'
. The former creates the variable in the workspace of the function that called the function within which assignin
is called; while the latter... I don't know - it doesn't seem to put the variable anywhere I can see.
The trick is to create a small function to assign variables to the calling workspace, and call this function from within assignin
:
function = save_function(fpath, varargin)
names = {}
for i=1:size(varargin,1)
names{i} = inputname(i+1); % have to offset by 1 to account for fpath
end
create_variables(names, varargin);
save(fpath, names{:});
end
function = create_variables(names, vals)
for i=1:size(names, 1)
assignin('caller', names{i}, vals{i});
end
end
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24502069/dynamically-assign-variables-in-matlab