Grunt watch tasks seem to take a very long time

问题

I'm running two simple tasks that run for <100ms each but when run under the watch command the two combined tasks are taking ~8 seconds in total (there seems to be an overhead of 3.5 seconds per task). I'm using it with live-reload for development and I'm finding it very frustrating. I tried setting spawn to false but this seemed to break it and none of the associated tasks were run.

Here's sample output from when a sass file is changed.

>> File "app/styles/main.scss" changed.

File "app/styles/main.css" created.

Done, without errors.

Elapsed time
loading tasks   4ms  ▇▇▇▇▇ 9%
sass            1ms  ▇▇ 2%
sass:dist      39ms  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 89%
Total 44ms
Completed in 3.862s at Mon Nov 18 2013 17:05:57 GMT+0000 (GMT) - Waiting...
OK
>> File "app/styles/main.css" changed.

Running "copy:styles" (copy) task
Copied 1 files

Done, without errors.

Elapsed time
loading tasks   4ms  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 24%
copy:styles    13ms  ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 76%
Total 17ms
Completed in 3.704s at Mon Nov 18 2013 17:06:01 GMT+0000 (GMT) - Waiting...
OK
>> File ".tmp/styles/main.css" changed.

... Reload .tmp/styles/main.css ...
... Reload .tmp/styles/main.css ...
Completed in 0.000s at Mon Nov 18 2013 17:06:01 GMT+0000 (GMT) - Waiting...

Using grunt 0.4.1 (and grunt-cli 0.1.11) on node.js 0.10.20. Running on 2012 Macbook Air (OS X 10.8.5)

回答1:

After file was changed, watch execute the tasks, but on finished, watch reload the Modules(!) and watched again.

Verbose to see the problem:

grunt tasknamewatch --verbose

I've tried a recursion on the watch task, but no success.

watch: {
    ...,
    tasks: ['sometask', 'watch']
}

An easy solution that worked well, was to use "grunt-este-watch". You can read the required steps here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/33920834/2741005

回答2:

Yeah, contrib-sass is a lot slower, thought that might have contributed to the problem. The only thing I could suggest is to minimise the amount of watch targets you are running; it looks like you are copying the css from app into tmp and then reloading that? Might be better to save your sass directly into tmp with something like a sass:dev task, that way you only run watch twice. This is how I usually do it:

watch: {
    sass: {
        files: [
            'styles/**/*.scss'
        ],
        tasks: ['sass', 'copy:dev', 'cssmin']
    },

    css: {
        options: {
            livereload: true
        },
        files: [
            'dist/css/master.css'
        ],
        tasks: []
    }
}

I can't help but think that it is the extra overhead of running copy in a different target altogether, of course you can run as many tasks as you like in that tasks array. :)

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20121361/grunt-watch-tasks-seem-to-take-a-very-long-time

标签

node.js

gruntjs

yeoman

grunt-contrib-watch