问题
I have two data frames:
x = data.frame(Var1= c("A", "B", "C", "D","E"),Var2=c("F","G","H","I","J"),
Value= c(11, 12, 13, 14,18))
y = data.frame(A= c(11, 12, 13, 14,18), B= c(15, 16, 17, 14,18),C= c(17, 22, 23, 24,18), D= c(11, 12, 13, 34,18),E= c(11, 5, 13, 55,18), F= c(8, 12, 13, 14,18),G= c(7, 5, 13, 14,18),
H= c(8, 12, 13, 14,18), I= c(9, 5, 13, 14,18), J= c(11, 12, 13, 14,18))
Var3 <- rep("time", each=length(x$Var1))
x=cbind(x,Var3)
time=seq(1:length(y[,1]))
y=cbind(y,time)
> x
Var1 Var2 Value Var3
1 A F 11 time
2 B G 12 time
3 C H 13 time
4 D I 14 time
5 E J 18 time
> y
A B C D E F G H I J time
1 11 15 17 11 11 8 7 8 9 11 1
2 12 16 22 12 5 12 5 12 5 12 2
3 13 17 23 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 3
4 14 14 24 34 55 14 14 14 14 14 4
5 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 5
Looking at x
DF, I have variable A
and F
as the first row. I want to select these two variables in y
DF and implement a simple regression: lm(A ~ F, data = y)
, and save the result in the first position of a list. I will do the same with the second row of x
DF implementing a regression lm(B ~ G, data = y)
.
How could I match variables names in x
to data in y
for a regression?
Revised question: how about a more complicated regression Var1 ~ Var2 + Var3
?
回答1:
x = data.frame(Var1= c("A", "B", "C", "D","E"),
Var2=c("F","G","H","I","J"),
Value= c(11, 12, 13, 14,18))
y = data.frame(A= c(11, 12, 13, 14,18),
B= c(15, 16, 17, 14,18),
C= c(17, 22, 23, 24,18),
D= c(11, 12, 13, 34,18),
E= c(11, 5, 13, 55,18),
F= c(8, 12, 13, 14,18),
G= c(7, 5, 13, 14,18),
H= c(8, 12, 13, 14,18),
I= c(9, 5, 13, 14,18),
J= c(11, 12, 13, 14,18))
We can use
fitmodel <- function (RHS, LHS) do.call("lm", list(formula = reformulate(RHS, LHS),
data = quote(y)))
modList <- Map(fitmodel, as.character(x$Var2), as.character(x$Var1))
modList[[1]] ## for example
#Call:
#lm(formula = A ~ F, data = y)
#
#Coefficients:
#(Intercept) F
# 4.3500 0.7115
Remarks:
The use of
do.call
is to ensure thatreformulate
is evaluated when passed tolm
. This is desired as it allows functions likeupdate
to work correctly on the model object. See Showing string in formula and not as variable in lm fit. For a comparison:oo <- Map(function (RHS, LHS) lm(reformulate(RHS, LHS), data = y), as.character(x$Var2), as.character(x$Var1)) oo[[1]] #Call: #lm(formula = reformulate(RHS, LHS), data = y) # #Coefficients: #(Intercept) F # 4.3500 0.7115
The
as.character
onx$Var1
andx$Var2
is necessary, as these two variables are currently "factor" variables not strings andreformulate
can't use them. If you putstringsAsFactors = FALSE
indata.frame
when you build yourx
, there is no such issue.
It works for you? It's not suppose to have a "for" loop?
The Map
function hides that "for" loop. It is a wrapper of the mapply
function. The *apply
family functions in R are a syntactic sugar.
Update on your revised question
Your original question is constructs a model formula as Var1 ~ Var2
.
Your new question wants Var1 ~ Var2 + Var3
.
x$Var3 <- rep("time", each=length(x$Var1))
y$time <- seq(1:length(y[,1]))
## collect multiple RHS variables (using concatenation function `c`)
RHS <- Map(base::c, as.character(x$Var2), as.character(x$Var3))
#str(RHS)
#List of 5 ## oh this list has names! annoying!!
# $ F: chr [1:2] "F" "time"
# $ G: chr [1:2] "G" "time"
# $ H: chr [1:2] "H" "time"
# $ I: chr [1:2] "I" "time"
# $ J: chr [1:2] "J" "time"
LHS <- as.character(x$Var1)
modList <- Map(fitmodel, RHS, LHS) ## `fitmodel` function unchanged
modList[[1]] ## for example
#Call:
#lm(formula = A ~ F + time, data = y)
#
#Coefficients:
#(Intercept) F time
# 5.6 0.5 0.5
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51914163/how-to-match-a-data-frame-of-variable-names-and-another-with-data-for-a-regressi