C99′s Fixed-Width Integer Types

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-12-08 05:13:35

问题


Failing to get a detailed answer to my question here. I thought I would tackle it from a different angle.

Would someone be able to explain what selection criteria are used for determining the underlying types for C99's fixed-width integer types:

[u]int_fast[n]_t
[u]int_least[n]_t
[u]int[n]_t

For a given processor, if 'long' and 'int' are the same size (sizeof(int) == sizeof(long)) then why would 'long' be used over 'int' or vice versa.


回答1:


The whim of the author of <stdint.h>.

Given that int and long are the same size (and assuming they have the same representation and other characteristics), it shouldn't matter at all which of them is used to define [u]int_{,_fast,_least}32_t, as long as the type or types satisfy the requirements of the standard.

Well, that's not quite true; it can make a difference in some cases. int and long, even if they're the same size, are still distinct and incompatible types. For example, given that int32_t is typedefed either as int or as long, the following program:

#include <stdint.h>
#include <stddef.h>
int main(void) {
    int32_t *p32 = NULL;
    int  *ip = p32;
    long *lp = p32;
    return  0;
}

violates a constraint and requires a diagnostic either on the declaration of ip or on the declaration of lp, depending on how int32_t is defined. But you should avoid writing such code anyway.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11518212/c99-s-fixed-width-integer-types

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!