I'm working on a scientific computing code (written in C++), and in addition to performing unit tests for the smaller components, I'd like to do regression testing on some of the numerical output by comparing to a "known-good" answer from previous revisions. There are a few features I'd like:
- Allow comparing numbers to a specified tolerance (for both roundoff error and looser expectations)
- Ability to distinguish between ints, doubles, etc, and to ignore text if necessary
- Well-formatted output to tell what went wrong and where: in a multi-column table of data, only show the column entry that differs
- Return
EXIT_SUCCESS
orEXIT_FAILURE
depending on whether the files match
Are there any good scripts or applications out there that do this, or will I have to roll my own in Python to read and compare output files? Surely I'm not the first person with these kind of requirements.
[The following is not strictly relevant, but it may factor into the decision of what to do. I use CMake and its embedded CTest functionality to drive unit tests that use the Google Test framework. I imagine that it shouldn't be hard to add a few add_custom_command
statements in my CMakeLists.txt
to call whatever regression software I need.]
You should go for PyUnit, which is now part of the standard lib under the name unittest
. It supports everything you asked for. The tolerance check, e.g., is done with assertAlmostEqual()
.
The ndiff utility may be close to what you're looking for: it's like diff, but it will compare text files of numbers to a desired tolerance.
I ended up writing a Python script to do more or less what I wanted.
#!/usr/bin/env python
import sys
import re
from optparse import OptionParser
from math import fabs
splitPattern = re.compile(r',|\s+|;')
class FailObject(object):
def __init__(self, options):
self.options = options
self.failure = False
def fail(self, brief, full = ""):
print ">>>> ", brief
if options.verbose and full != "":
print " ", full
self.failure = True
def exit(self):
if (self.failure):
print "FAILURE"
sys.exit(1)
else:
print "SUCCESS"
sys.exit(0)
def numSplit(line):
list = splitPattern.split(line)
if list[-1] == "":
del list[-1]
numList = [float(a) for a in list]
return numList
def softEquiv(ref, target, tolerance):
if (fabs(target - ref) <= fabs(ref) * tolerance):
return True
#if the reference number is zero, allow tolerance
if (ref == 0.0):
return (fabs(target) <= tolerance)
#if reference is non-zero and it failed the first test
return False
def compareStrings(f, options, expLine, actLine, lineNum):
### check that they're a bunch of numbers
try:
exp = numSplit(expLine)
act = numSplit(actLine)
except ValueError, e:
# print "It looks like line %d is made of strings (exp=%s, act=%s)." \
# % (lineNum, expLine, actLine)
if (expLine != actLine and options.checkText):
f.fail( "Text did not match in line %d" % lineNum )
return
### check the ranges
if len(exp) != len(act):
f.fail( "Wrong number of columns in line %d" % lineNum )
return
### soft equiv on each value
for col in range(0, len(exp)):
expVal = exp[col]
actVal = act[col]
if not softEquiv(expVal, actVal, options.tol):
f.fail( "Non-equivalence in line %d, column %d"
% (lineNum, col) )
return
def run(expectedFileName, actualFileName, options):
# message reporter
f = FailObject(options)
expected = open(expectedFileName)
actual = open(actualFileName)
lineNum = 0
while True:
lineNum += 1
expLine = expected.readline().rstrip()
actLine = actual.readline().rstrip()
## check that the files haven't ended,
# or that they ended at the same time
if expLine == "":
if actLine != "":
f.fail("Tested file ended too late.")
break
if actLine == "":
f.fail("Tested file ended too early.")
break
compareStrings(f, options, expLine, actLine, lineNum)
#print "%3d: %s|%s" % (lineNum, expLine[0:10], actLine[0:10])
f.exit()
################################################################################
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser = OptionParser(usage = "%prog [options] ExpectedFile NewFile")
parser.add_option("-q", "--quiet",
action="store_false", dest="verbose", default=True,
help="Don't print status messages to stdout")
parser.add_option("--check-text",
action="store_true", dest="checkText", default=False,
help="Verify that lines of text match exactly")
parser.add_option("-t", "--tolerance",
action="store", type="float", dest="tol", default=1.e-15,
help="Relative error when comparing doubles")
(options, args) = parser.parse_args()
if len(args) != 2:
print "Usage: numdiff.py EXPECTED ACTUAL"
sys.exit(1)
run(args[0], args[1], options)
I know I'm quite late to the party, but a few months ago I wrote the nrtest utility in an attempt to make this workflow easier. It sounds like it might help you too.
Here's a quick overview. Each test is defined by its input files and its expected output files. Following execution, output files are stored in a portable benchmark directory. A second step then compares this benchmark to a reference benchmark. A recent update has enabled user extensions, so you can define comparison functions for your custom data.
I hope it helps.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1055471/numerical-regression-testing