问题
Writing some XML documentation for a predicate helper class. But I can't figure out I can refer to an Expression<Func<T, bool>> without getting a syntax error. Is it even possible? I have tried this:
<see cref="Expression{Func{T, bool}}"/>
But I get a red squiggly line under {T, bool}}. This works though:
<see cref="Expression{TDelegate}"/>
Anyone have a clue?
Update:
The answer that was given (and I accepted) seemingly did work. But now I have started to get a lot of warnings about stuff not being able to resolve. I have a class called ExpressionBuilder<T> which works with Expression<Func<T, bool>> a lot. So I of course want to refer to that in my XML comments.
I have tried both versions that I know about:
<see cref="Expression<Func<T, Boolean>>"/>
<see cref="Expression{Func{T, Boolean}}"/>
But neither work. (And on the last one, ReSharper puts a blue squiggly under {T,Boolean}} I get two warnings under compilation everywhere I have used it which says that:
- XML comment on 'blah blah' has cref attribute 'Expression>' that could not be resolved
- Type parameter declaration must be an identifier not a type. See also error CS0081.
Have the same issue somewhere I tried to refer to Range<Nullable<DateTime>> (Range<DateTime?> didnt work either. Both with { } and with < >)
Am I not supposed to refer to these kinds of generics?
回答1:
There seems to be no way to refer to a generic of a generic in XML documentation, because actually, there's no way to refer to a generic of any specific type.
Lasse V Karlsen's answer made it click for me:
If you write <see cref="IEnumerable{Int32}" />, the compiler just uses "Int32" as the type parameter name, not the type argument. Writing <see cref="IEnumerable{HelloWorld}" /> would work just as well. This makes sense because there is no specific page in MSDN for "IEnumerable of int" that your documentation could link to.
To document your class properly, I think you'd have to write something like:
<summary>
Returns an <see cref="IEnumerable{T}" /> of <see cref="KeyValuePair{T,U}" />
of <see cref="String" />, <see cref="Int32" />.
</summary>
I hope you like text.
回答2:
What exactly would you like it to link to?
There's no such thing in the documentation as a Expression<Func<T>>, so obviously a link to that would not work.
You can link to Expression<TDelegate> because that exists.
As for what works or not, neither of the following works in Visual Studio 2008 / .NET 3.5 for me:
/// <see cref="Expression<Func<T>>"/>.
/// <see cref="Expression{Func{T}}"/>.
But this works:
/// <see cref="Expression{T}"/>.
so apparently the generic type parameter doesn't have to the same as the one in the declaration.
回答3:
// Use "<" instead of "<" symbol and ">" instead of ">" symbol.
// Sample:
<see cref="Expression<Func<T, bool>>"/>
回答4:
I'm running into this now, as I have a function that returns a List<List<byte>>. Yeah, it's ugly, but I didn't write it. Standard disclaimer, I know.
Anyway, in VS 2017 with R# Ultimate 2017.1, this doc comment...
<returns><see cref="List{List{Byte}}" /> of split frames</returns>
...gives me a syntax error. However, this...
<returns><see><cref>List{List{byte}}</cref></see> of split frames</returns>
...does not. Eeeenteresting.
Still ugly? Yes.
As ugly? I think it's less horrible than using < and > myself....
回答5:
Don't use an empty see element (<see cref="..." />). Instead, put text inside the see element
<see cref="IEnumerable{T}">IEnumerable</see><<see cref="..."/>$gt;
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/684982/referring-to-a-generic-type-of-a-generic-type-in-c-sharp-xml-documentation