I'm writing a page that can use a couple of different themes, and I'm going to store some information about each theme in the web.config.
Is it more efficient to create a new sectionGroup and store everything together, or just put everything in appSettings?
configSection solution
<configSections>
<sectionGroup name="SchedulerPage">
<section name="Providers" type="System.Configuration.NameValueSectionHandler"/>
<section name="Themes" type="System.Configuration.NameValueSectionHandler"/>
</sectionGroup>
</configSections>
<SchedulerPage>
<Themes>
<add key="PI" value="PISchedulerForm"/>
<add key="UB" value="UBSchedulerForm"/>
</Themes>
</SchedulerPage>
To access values in the configSection, I am using this code:
NameValueCollection themes = ConfigurationManager.GetSection("SchedulerPage/Themes") as NameValueCollection;
String SchedulerTheme = themes["UB"];
appSettings solution
<appSettings>
<add key="PITheme" value="PISchedulerForm"/>
<add key="UBTheme" value="UBSchedulerForm"/>
</appSettings>
To access values in appSettings, I am using this code
String SchedulerTheme = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["UBSchedulerForm"].ToString();
For more complex configuration setup, I would use a custom configuration section that clearly defines the roles of each section for example
<appMonitoring enabled="true" smtpServer="xxx">
<alertRecipients>
<add name="me" email="me@me.com"/>
</alertRecipient>
</appMonitoring>
In your configuration class you can expose your properties with something like
public class MonitoringConfig : ConfigurationSection
{
[ConfigurationProperty("smtp", IsRequired = true)]
public string Smtp
{
get { return this["smtp"] as string; }
}
public static MonitoringConfig GetConfig()
{
return ConfigurationManager.GetSection("appMonitoring") as MonitoringConfig
}
}
You can then access configuration properties in the following way from your code
string smtp = MonitoringConfig.GetConfig().Smtp;
There will be no measurable difference in terms of efficiency.
AppSettings is great if all you need are name/value pairs.
For anything more complex, it's worth creating a custom configuration section.
For the example you mention, I'd use appSettings.
There'll be no difference in performance, since ConfigurationManager.AppSettings just calls GetSection("appSettings") anyway. If you'll need to enumerate all the keys, then a custom section will be nicer than enumerating all of appSettings and looking for some prefix on the keys, but otherwise it's easier to stick to appSettings unless you need something more complex than a NameValueCollection.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/204695/storing-values-in-the-web-config-appsettings-or-configsection-which-is-more