svk

How do I avoid checking in local changes to the SVN repository?

六月ゝ 毕业季﹏ 提交于 2019-12-19 02:34:08
问题 I have to make local changes to my project files in order to get it to run in a different environment. Twice now I accidentally checked those changes in (and messed up everyone else's running environment). There are probably a lot of better ways to set up our build, but since I work as a consultant on an established project I can't really change how the customer works. I've tried setting up a second branch in the same repository (which backfired, duplicating the entire tree in the root of

svk checksum mismatch

早过忘川 提交于 2019-12-11 19:14:41
问题 I've been using SVK without any issues the last 6 months. I then attempted to commit a file, when the following error occurred: %> svk commit -m "Message" foo/bar/file.txt Commit into mirrored path: merging back directly. Merging back to mirror source file:///usr/local/svn/repo. A checksum mismatch occurred: Base checksum mismatch on '/trunk/foo/bar/file.txt': expected: 9e421f7db5c4c0d6796c90524456d7f4 actual: ed4e76ccf3e54223908179735ecf1e89 Anyone know how to resolve this issue? 回答1: Just

How do I avoid checking in local changes to the SVN repository?

一世执手 提交于 2019-11-30 19:47:24
I have to make local changes to my project files in order to get it to run in a different environment. Twice now I accidentally checked those changes in (and messed up everyone else's running environment). There are probably a lot of better ways to set up our build, but since I work as a consultant on an established project I can't really change how the customer works. I've tried setting up a second branch in the same repository (which backfired, duplicating the entire tree in the root of their repository--I won't be messing around with that again). Tried setting up a second repository of my

Using git-svn (or similar) *just* to help out with an svn merge?

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2019-11-27 10:53:14
Some complex subversion merges are coming up in my project: big branches that have been apart for a long time. Svn gives too many conflicts - and some of them seem spurious. Given that git is praised for a superiour merge experience, Would it be any good to use git-svn just for the benefit of making the merge more manageable? Can you recommend other alternatives (eg. svk , hgsvn ) to lessen the merge pain? Some conflicts are easy enough to resolve (e.g java imports, whitespaces) - so I'm also wondering if there is any automated solutions for those. A full switch to DVCS might happen in the

Using git-svn (or similar) *just* to help out with an svn merge?

半腔热情 提交于 2019-11-26 17:58:29
问题 Some complex subversion merges are coming up in my project: big branches that have been apart for a long time. Svn gives too many conflicts - and some of them seem spurious. Given that git is praised for a superiour merge experience, Would it be any good to use git-svn just for the benefit of making the merge more manageable? Can you recommend other alternatives (eg. svk , hgsvn ) to lessen the merge pain? Some conflicts are easy enough to resolve (e.g java imports, whitespaces) - so I'm also