remote-branch

Update a local branch with the changes from a tracked remote branch

廉价感情. 提交于 2020-04-07 10:50:27
问题 I have a local branch named ' my_local_branch ', which tracks a remote branch origin/my_remote_branch . Now, the remote branch has been updated, and I am on the ' my_local_branch ' and want to pull in those changes. Should I just do: git pull origin my_remote_branch:my_local_branch Is this the correct way? 回答1: You have set the upstream of that branch (see: "How do you make an existing git branch track a remote branch?" and "Git: Why do I need to do --set-upstream-to all the time?" ) git

Update a local branch with the changes from a tracked remote branch

霸气de小男生 提交于 2020-04-07 10:50:26
问题 I have a local branch named ' my_local_branch ', which tracks a remote branch origin/my_remote_branch . Now, the remote branch has been updated, and I am on the ' my_local_branch ' and want to pull in those changes. Should I just do: git pull origin my_remote_branch:my_local_branch Is this the correct way? 回答1: You have set the upstream of that branch (see: "How do you make an existing git branch track a remote branch?" and "Git: Why do I need to do --set-upstream-to all the time?" ) git

git pull all branches from remote repository

故事扮演 提交于 2019-12-28 05:01:23
问题 How do I pull all of the remote branches to my own repository? if I type: git branch -a I get a long list of branches, but if I type: git branch I see only 2 of them. How do I pull ALL branches into my local list? I know I can do: git checkout --track origin/branch-name but that pulls and checks out only one branch at a time. Any way to get it all done at once without that whole tedious work of running git checkout --track origin/branch-name over and over and over again? ps. I tried following

Bitbucket does not show all branches

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2019-12-24 04:33:15
问题 I have a repository on bitbucket that contains three branches. I'm able to list the remote branches using a good old git branch --remote command, and everything works perfectly. However, when I visit my repository using a browser, I can only see two branches. Someone please help. Bitbucket just ate my branch 回答1: The "active" filter on the Bitbucket branch screen only shows the main branch (usually named "master") and any branches that are ahead of the main branch. You can click "merged" at

Git: Cannot see new remote branch

戏子无情 提交于 2019-12-20 07:59:09
问题 A colleague pushed a new remote branch to origin/dev/homepage and I cannot see it when I run: $ git branch -r I still see preexisting remote branches. I assume this is because my local remote refs are not up-to-date hence when I ran a git pull nothing happened since git pull only pulls on the current working branch correct? Unlike git push which pushes all branches that have changes to the corresponding remote branch? 回答1: First, double check that the branch has been actually pushed remotely,

Git fetch a branch once with a normal name, and once with capital letter

生来就可爱ヽ(ⅴ<●) 提交于 2019-12-17 16:41:41
问题 I'm fetching for remote branches and stuck in some sort of a loop. I fetch once and get: $ git fetch * [new branch] minorRelease/something-> origin/minorRelease/something And then I fetch again and get: $ git fetch * [new branch] minorRelease/Something-> origin/minorRelease/Something Same branch but with a capital S . I tried to delete the file from the following folder .git/refs/remotes/origin/minorRelease , but when fetching again, I get both and return to the loop above: $ git fetch * [new

Can Git Remotes be Cascaded?

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2019-12-11 09:46:16
问题 My Windows Computer: Has a local git repository (R1) for a Visual Studio project. The remote (origin) for this repository is GitHub. They are identical with just a Master branch. (All of the commits have been pushed to GitHub.) NAS (local y: drive): Has an unused git repository (R2) that was created "init --bare" and nothing else has happened here. What I would like to do (I think) is have the R2 the origin remote of R1, and GitHub the origin remote of R2. Development would occur in R1 (or

restore all refs from git bundle

不羁的心 提交于 2019-12-11 04:39:13
问题 How to restore all remote branches from backup (git bundle). Backup: $ git bundle create /tmp/dp --all $ git bundle list-heads /tmp/dp | head -n5 f37c9fc7f0ce121568f42fb01390b1862c67f308 refs/heads/master f37c9fc7f0ce121568f42fb01390b1862c67f308 refs/heads/show 9aabc2a4fb18181fee6d0e7e03170a976b6ed49b refs/remotes/origin/NewLayers aef1fc8a416413ee5b7f4370f255ab654b3407ee refs/remotes/origin/elevator bc4c78f94a67857fbd7210ecc5ebcd80ec736b1a refs/remotes/origin/elevator_1 $ git bundle verify

GIT: remove remote branches with no local tracking branch

ⅰ亾dé卋堺 提交于 2019-12-10 17:17:33
问题 Let's say that git branch -a outputs something like this: A B C *master remotes/origin/A remotes/origin/B remotes/origin/C remotes/origin/master remotes/origin/X remotes/origin/Y remotes/origin/Z In bold are those branches (X, Y, Z) that are in the remote repository but I have not checked them out yet and I don't even intend to, they are related to a project I don't participate in. Is there a command to remove all remote branches ( those that are saved on MY repository, not the actual remote

Git clone does not bring master branch

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2019-12-09 03:11:13
问题 I have a remote repository http://github.com/fernandezpablo85/Test This repo has a master branch, but it's behind two other branches so when I clone it I get this warining: warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout. And also I don't get a local master branch ( git branch shows nothing). I can fix the whole thing doing: git checkout -b master origin/master But I was wondering why this happens? Is master supposed to be the more advanced branch? Or is there something