rcs

问题 I have a 20-year-old project that I would like to migrate from RCS to git, without losing the history. All web pages suggest that the One True Path is through CVS. But after an hour of Googling and trying different scripts, I have yet to find anything that successfully converts my RCS project tree to CVS. I'm hoping the good people at Stackoverflow will know what actually works, as opposed to what is claimed to work and doesn't. (I searched Stackoverflow using both the native SO search and a

问题 Hello I am working with a simulator that uses rcS scripts to boot, this is my script cd /tests ./test1 & ./test2 & ./test3 & ./test4 exit What I want is run all the test at the same time and that the exit command is executed only when all the previous test have finished. And not only when test 4 has finished, is this possible?. Thank you. 回答1: You can use wait: ./test1 & ./test2 & ./test3 & ./test4 & wait From the bash man page: wait [n ...] Wait for each specified process and return its

问题 Hello I am working with a simulator that uses rcS scripts to boot, this is my script cd /tests ./test1 & ./test2 & ./test3 & ./test4 exit What I want is run all the test at the same time and that the exit command is executed only when all the previous test have finished. And not only when test 4 has finished, is this possible?. Thank you. 回答1: You can use wait: ./test1 & ./test2 & ./test3 & ./test4 & wait From the bash man page: wait [n ...] Wait for each specified process and return its

问题 I understand that this question has, in essence, already been asked, but that question did not have an unequivocal answer, so please bear with me. Background: In my company, we use Perforce submission numbers as part of our versioning. Regardless of whether this is a correct method or not, that is how things are. Currently, many developers do separate submissions for code and documentation: first the code and then the documentation to update the client-facing docs with what the new version

问题 I currently use RCS' merge command to do 3-way merges, but one thing has always annoyed me about it. If I use the -A option, the same change made in both files shows up as a conflict: <<<<<<< file1 file1 line 1 ||||||| orig orig line 1 ======= file2 line 1 >>>>>>> file2 orig line 2 <<<<<<< orig ======= line added in both changes >>>>>>> file2 orig line 3 If I use the default (-E) then those identical changes are not shown, but then the ouput only shows the two contributors, not the ancestor,

问题 I'd like to filter files using RCS keyword expansion so that instances of $Change$ are translated to 1745 rather than the default behaviour of $Change: 1745 $ . I realize that this would prevent future expansions, but that's acceptable for the purposes. Other methods of inserting the changelist number into a file are also welcome. This is the only method I've seen with Perforce that works during submission -- it's just that I'd like to clean it up so that it can be cleanly inserted into

问题 I am using SVN for development tasks, but still have many files managed with RCS, because it does not seem reasonable to edit them in my private SVN repository working copy (since they're often just configuration files that are also best tested in-place). It also doesn't seem reasonable to have a working copy of the repository wherever there are files to put under SVN control, so I just use RCS instead. What is your approach for managing files that should ideally not be moved around / are

问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 2 years ago . I am doing a whole bunch of conversions of CVS and RCS repositories into Subversion. Every now and then I run into a damaged ,v file. I have figured out how to repair these manually, but it's getting tedious, and my latest project has numerous damaged files, more than I care to repair manually. So I'd like to