parfor

How to nest multiple parfor loops

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2019-11-27 13:22:23
parfor is a convenient way to distribute independent iterations of intensive computations among several "workers". One meaningful restriction is that parfor -loops cannot be nested, and invariably, that is the answer to similar questions like there and there . Why parallelization across loop boundaries is so desirable Consider the following piece of code where iterations take a highly variable amount of time on a machine that allows 4 workers. Both loops iterate over 6 values, clearly hard to share among 4. for row = 1:6 parfor col = 1:6 somefun(row, col); end end It seems like a good idea to

Matlab: Print progress from parfor loop

我们两清 提交于 2019-11-27 11:33:11
问题 I run a lot of long simulations in Matlab, typically taking from a couple of minutes to a couple of hours, so to speed things up I decided to run the simulations simultaneously using a parfor loop. arglist = [arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4]; parfor ii = 1:size(arglist, 2) myfun(arglist(ii)); end Everything worked just fine, except for one thing: the progress printing. Since each simulation takes a lot of time, I usually print progress using something like prevlength = 0; for ii = 1:tot_iter % Some

Sending data to workers

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-11-26 21:34:36
问题 I am trying to create a piece of parallel code to speed up the processing of a very large (couple of hundred million rows) array. In order to parallelise this, I chopped my data into 8 (my number of cores) pieces and tried sending each worker 1 piece. Looking at my RAM usage however, it seems each piece is send to each worker, effectively multiplying my RAM usage by 8. A minimum working example: A = 1:16; for ii = 1:8 data{ii} = A(2*ii-1:2*ii); end Now, when I send this data to workers using

How to nest multiple parfor loops

不羁的心 提交于 2019-11-26 16:18:50
问题 parfor is a convenient way to distribute independent iterations of intensive computations among several "workers". One meaningful restriction is that parfor -loops cannot be nested, and invariably, that is the answer to similar questions like there and there. Why parallelization across loop boundaries is so desirable Consider the following piece of code where iterations take a highly variable amount of time on a machine that allows 4 workers. Both loops iterate over 6 values, clearly hard to

parfor in matlab. sliced variable and nested loop

邮差的信 提交于 2019-11-26 14:47:22
问题 I did my best to follow the documentation of the parallel toolbox, but still I could not avoid the problem of reusing array that was indexed in a nested loop. The problem is with variable node parfor i=1:nX for j=1:nY [ind,dist]=findInCircle(node(i,j,:), part,r); UV=calcVelocity(part(ind,:), dist,node(i,j,:)) ; %here matlab complains that node is not indexed properly node(i,j,3)= UV(1); node(i,j,4)= UV(2); node(i,j,5)= UV(3); end end I do not use the array outside of the nested loop, the

MATLAB parfor is slower than for — what is wrong?

隐身守侯 提交于 2019-11-26 04:52:44
the code I'm dealing with has loops like the following: bistar = zeros(numdims,numcases); parfor hh=1:nt bistar = bistar + A(:,:,hh)*data(:,:,hh+1)' ; end for small nt (10). After timing it, it is actually 100 times slower than using the regular loop!!! I know that parfor can do parallel sums, so I'm not sure why this isn't working. I run matlabpool with the out-of-the-box configurations before running my code. I'm relatively new to matlab, and just started to use the parallel features, so please don't assume that I'm am not doing something stupid. Thanks! PS: I'm running the code on a quad

MATLAB parfor is slower than for — what is wrong?

跟風遠走 提交于 2019-11-26 01:53:58
问题 the code I\'m dealing with has loops like the following: bistar = zeros(numdims,numcases); parfor hh=1:nt bistar = bistar + A(:,:,hh)*data(:,:,hh+1)\' ; end for small nt (10). After timing it, it is actually 100 times slower than using the regular loop!!! I know that parfor can do parallel sums, so I\'m not sure why this isn\'t working. I run matlabpool with the out-of-the-box configurations before running my code. I\'m relatively new to matlab, and just started to use the parallel features,

Saving time and memory using parfor?

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2019-11-25 23:49:44
问题 Consider prova.mat in MATLAB obtained in the following way for w=1:100 for p=1:9 A{p}=randn(100,1); end baseA_.A=A; eval([\'baseA.A\' num2str(w) \'= baseA_;\']) end save(sprintf(\'prova.mat\'),\'-v7.3\', \'baseA\') To have an idea of the actual dimensions in my data, the 1x9 cell in A1 is composed by the following 9 arrays: 904x5, 913x5, 1722x5, 4136x5, 9180x5, 3174x5, 5970x5, 4455x5, 340068x5 . The other Aj \'s have a similar composition. Consider the following code clear all load prova tic