laravel-facade

问题 What is the proper way to manipulate final output before sending it to browser? (laravel 5.*) I have created facade namespace App\Facades; use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Response as ResponseFacade; use Illuminate\Http\Response as ResponseHttp; class Response extends ResponseFacade { public static function viewMod($view, $data = [], $status = 200, array $headers = []) { $output = \Response::view($view, $data, $status, $headers); return some_manipulating_function($output); } } and in the

问题 In my standalone (without Laravel) project i want to use Illuminate IoC container. Also i would like to access the app container through App facade provided by illuminate/support component. I installed both components (v5.0.28). Here is my (simplified) code: function setup_App(){ $container = new Illuminate\Container\Container(); Illuminate\Support\Facades\Facade::setFacadeApplication($container); class_alias('Illuminate\Support\Facades\App', 'App'); } setup_App(); App::bind('w', 'Widget');

问题 For some context - earlier today I was struggling to figure out how to implement a facade similar to Cache - where I could set a provider (like disk()), but also have a generic fall back provider when not supplied. Now, I got the basic infrastructure working, but I think my implementation is nasty. Having call default() or provider() just stinks. However, there is a concept or something I'm missing to fill in the gaps here. Implementing similar functionality to Cache::disk('x') in Laravel

问题 I am trying to use the vinkla/pusher package with Laravel 5.1. It is a common known issue that the facades don't work because of a conflict: https://github.com/vinkla/pusher/issues/2 A solution is to rename the facade. How would I go about doing this? I know it wouldn't be as simple as renaming the file.. Thanks! 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31912408/renaming-a-facade-conflicts

问题 What, I had been doing previously was to inject only MY MODELS using the constructor and use Facades for the Laravel's provided classes i.e. Session , Auth , Validator etc, for example. Will it be a good idea if I inject each and every class (either mine or Laravel's) through construct and use it by $this->.. syntax or should I inject my own classes using constructor and use Facades for anything provided by Laravel? To be more specific, here is what my controllers normally look like: class

问题 How can I fix this alert in PhpStorm? And also how to get autocompletion for Route and other Facades? 回答1: Check the Laracasts walkthrough 1) Go to: https://github.com/barryvdh/laravel-ide-helper 2) Click on the gist Generated version for L5: https://gist.github.com/barryvdh/5227822 3) Click on "Raw" to get the current version (as of June 22, 2016 it is): https://gist.githubusercontent.com/barryvdh/5227822/raw/4d4b0ca26055fa4753b38edeb94fad2396c497c0/_ide_helper.php 4) Make sure you're in

问题 After installing Laravel 5.6 on PHP 7.1.8 (fedora 23) using composer, when I try to open url in browser, I get this error PHP Fatal error: Uncaught RuntimeException: A facade root has not been set. in vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Facade.php:218\nStack trace: \n#0 vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Foundation/Exceptions/Handler.php(396): Illuminate\\Support\\Facades\\Facade::__callStatic('replaceNamespac...', Array) \n#1 vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate

问题 I want to override the Laravels' Mail's classes facade method send (just intercept it forcing some checks and then if it passes triggering parent::send()) What is the best way to do this? 回答1: A Facade doesn't work like that. It's essentially kind of like a wrapper class that calls the underlying class that it represents. The Mail facade doesn't actually have a send method. When you do Mail::send() , under the hood, the "facade accessor" is used to reference an instance of the Illuminate\Mail

问题 I want to override the Laravels' Mail's classes facade method send (just intercept it forcing some checks and then if it passes triggering parent::send()) What is the best way to do this? 回答1: A Facade doesn't work like that. It's essentially kind of like a wrapper class that calls the underlying class that it represents. The Mail facade doesn't actually have a send method. When you do Mail::send() , under the hood, the "facade accessor" is used to reference an instance of the Illuminate\Mail

问题 Based on Input Facade API and Request Facade API the Input::get() method seems to be the only difference. Am I missing something here? I know Validation can be applied to Requests, but I am not sure if the same is true for the Input facade. 回答1: Yes both Facades are very similar. The reason for this is that the underlying class is the same ( Illuminate\Http\Request ). You can see this by looking at both Facade classes and their accessors: Illuminate\Support\Facades\Input protected static