git-branch

问题 I know this type of a question has a lot duplicates, but I wanted to open a new one because I didn't found in all of the other questions the explaination of the best way to do it as I want. I know i can revert and keep the history by doing: git reset --soft c14809fa I want to revert the development branch and keep the history on a different branch. If I checkout the development to a new branch before I revert the commits - For example git checkout -b beforeRevert Than I will checkout back to

问题 Good Day. I Try to create a new Branch in my Repo. I made this: Git branch events Git Checkout events That worked. So I changed some files and made Git Status Git add --all Git Commit -m "Commit" That worked well but I tried to push it and that didn't work: Git push -u origin events This is the Error: Enumerating objects: 9, done. Counting objects: 100% (9/9), done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done. Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 716 bytes | 716.00

问题 Good Day. I Try to create a new Branch in my Repo. I made this: Git branch events Git Checkout events That worked. So I changed some files and made Git Status Git add --all Git Commit -m "Commit" That worked well but I tried to push it and that didn't work: Git push -u origin events This is the Error: Enumerating objects: 9, done. Counting objects: 100% (9/9), done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done. Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 716 bytes | 716.00

问题 Good Day. I Try to create a new Branch in my Repo. I made this: Git branch events Git Checkout events That worked. So I changed some files and made Git Status Git add --all Git Commit -m "Commit" That worked well but I tried to push it and that didn't work: Git push -u origin events This is the Error: Enumerating objects: 9, done. Counting objects: 100% (9/9), done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done. Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 716 bytes | 716.00

问题 Foreword We have a big SVN repository (200k+ commits and hundreds of branches and tags). A big, ominous, unmaintainable, frustrating mess. To work more efficiently, about a year ago I did a git svn clone on my development machine, so I locally develop on GIT and then push to SVN. We're now thinking about splitting up the repository and move the main development branches to git, or at least to move our development branch on git. Since I have my local git repository, I wanted to do some test by

问题 How do I create a new branch in git to begin work on a new feature? I want the new branch to be a duplicate of the current branch (ie, the new branch's HEAD should be the same as the current HEAD). Question differentiation: Create a branch in Git from another branch seems related but is actually about why a branch is fast-forward merged. How do you create a remote Git branch? is about creating a new branch on a remote. 回答1: TL;DR: To create and start work on a new branch called FEATURE , you

问题 How do I create a new branch in git to begin work on a new feature? I want the new branch to be a duplicate of the current branch (ie, the new branch's HEAD should be the same as the current HEAD). Question differentiation: Create a branch in Git from another branch seems related but is actually about why a branch is fast-forward merged. How do you create a remote Git branch? is about creating a new branch on a remote. 回答1: TL;DR: To create and start work on a new branch called FEATURE , you

问题 I'm in my first software engineering class. It's the first time any of us has worked in a team and used git and github. In class our teacher told us that you should usually branch off the master, after you finish your new feature, merge it back to the master. This is what I've been doing. However the other members of my group are not branching. They pull from the master on github to their local machine, make edits, finish their feature on their local master, then push to the master on github.

问题 I'm in my first software engineering class. It's the first time any of us has worked in a team and used git and github. In class our teacher told us that you should usually branch off the master, after you finish your new feature, merge it back to the master. This is what I've been doing. However the other members of my group are not branching. They pull from the master on github to their local machine, make edits, finish their feature on their local master, then push to the master on github.

问题 Why does "git remote show origin" list remote branches as "tracked" even when those branches are not linked to a local branch for pull/push? Does "tracked" mean something else in this context? I thought that was the whole meaning of "tracked": git docs on branch tracking. 1) clone a repo with more than one remote branch 2) run git remote show origin -- says "testBranch" is tracked. But git branch -vv correctly shows only master tracking origin/master, and git branch -a correctly shows that