dfa

How do you construct the union of two DFA's?

与世无争的帅哥 提交于 2019-12-06 23:47:30
问题 Does anyone have a straightforward description of the algorithm for constructing the union of two given DFA's? For example, say we have two DFA's over {0,1} where {w|w has an odd number of characters} w has states A and B delta | 0 | 1 ---------------- A | B | B ---------------- B | A | A {x|x has an even number of 1s} x has states a and b delta | 0 | 1 ---------------- a | a | b ---------------- b | b | a I have a resulting transition table showing the union as: delta | 0 | 1 ---------------

Efficient algorithm for converting a character set into a nfa/dfa

依然范特西╮ 提交于 2019-12-05 20:17:48
问题 I'm currently working on a scanner generator. The generator already works fine. But when using character classes the algorithm gets very slow. The scanner generator produces a scanner for UTF8 encoded files. The full range of characters (0x000000 to 0x10ffff) should be supported. If I use large character sets, like the any operator '.' or the unicode property {L}, the nfa (and also the dfa) contains a lot of states ( > 10000 ). So the convertation for nfa to dfa and create the minimal dfa

How do you construct the union of two DFA's?

只愿长相守 提交于 2019-12-05 04:15:24
Does anyone have a straightforward description of the algorithm for constructing the union of two given DFA's? For example, say we have two DFA's over {0,1} where {w|w has an odd number of characters} w has states A and B delta | 0 | 1 ---------------- A | B | B ---------------- B | A | A {x|x has an even number of 1s} x has states a and b delta | 0 | 1 ---------------- a | a | b ---------------- b | b | a I have a resulting transition table showing the union as: delta | 0 | 1 ---------------- Aa | Ba | Bb ---------------- Ab | Bb | Ba ---------------- Ba | Aa | Ab ---------------- Bb | Ab |

NFA 、DFA 简述

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2019-12-04 07:08:08
转载请注明出处 https://www.cnblogs.com/majianming/p/11823697.html 目前常见的正则表达引擎总体分为2种,DFA (确定型有穷状态自动机) 和 NFA (非确定型有穷状态自动机) 如果细分,NFA 可以分为传统NFA和POSIX NFA 那么如何区分3者 如果某种正则引擎如果他不能匹配能很快给出结果,那么他可能是DFA 如果只有在能够匹配的时候才能快速给出结果,那么就是传统NFA 如果无论能不能匹配,匹配的时间都基本一致,那么就是POSIX NFA why ? 首先先看 DFA,DFA 是文本主导的表达式引擎,实际上,对于确定的DFA表达式,状态的个数是确定的,这个也是为什么是确定型有穷状态 通过DFA 表达式,可以分析出所有可能的匹配路径,也就是说,在匹配还没开始的时候,所有路径都已经确定了(如果遇到某个字符 就走某个指定的路径),接下来需要做的就是在匹配文本,然后删掉不符合的路径,如果中途存在没有的路径,那么匹配失败,如果到最后存在多条匹配成功的路径,那么取匹配最长的路径 另外DFA 不支持反向引用和环视 而NFA 是表达式主导的引擎,也就是说实际上是拿文本到表达式测试,如果成功就继续匹配,失败就回溯或者选择其他分支或者报告匹配失败 在NFA中分为两种引擎,传统NFA和POSIX NFA 传统NFA和POSIX

Efficient algorithm for converting a character set into a nfa/dfa

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2019-12-04 02:40:27
I'm currently working on a scanner generator. The generator already works fine. But when using character classes the algorithm gets very slow. The scanner generator produces a scanner for UTF8 encoded files. The full range of characters (0x000000 to 0x10ffff) should be supported. If I use large character sets, like the any operator '.' or the unicode property {L}, the nfa (and also the dfa) contains a lot of states ( > 10000 ). So the convertation for nfa to dfa and create the minimal dfa takes a long time (even if the output minimal dfa contains only a few states). Here's my current

第九次作业-DFA最小化

回眸只為那壹抹淺笑 提交于 2019-12-03 23:52:20
1.将DFA最小化:教材P65 第9题 2.构造以下文法相应的最小的DFA S→ 0A|1B A→ 1S|1 B→0S|0 S→0(1S+1)+1(0S+0) S→01S+01+10S+10 S→(01+10)S+(01+10) S→(01|10)*(01|10) 3.自上而下语法分析,回溯产生的原因是什么? 产生式中有公共因子。 4.P100 练习4,反复提取公共左因子。 S→C$ C→bA|aB A→a|aC|bAA B→b|bC|aBB 反复提取: S→C$ C→bA|aB A→a(ε|C)|bAA A→aA'|bAA B→b(ε|C)|aBB B→bB'|aBB A'→ε|C B'→ε|C 来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/Fishmark/p/11797435.html

DFA最小化

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-12-03 23:00:56
1.将DFA最小化:教材P65 第9题 1 {1,2,3,4,5} {6,7} {1,2,5}b {1,2,5} {3,4}b {3,4} {1,2,3,4,5}可区别,划分 {6}b {6} {7}b {6} {6,7}不可区别,等价 2 {1,2,5}{3,4} {6,7,} {3}b {6,7} {4}b {6,7} {3}c {3,4} {4}c {3,4} {3}d {1,2,5} {4}d {1,2,5} {3,4,}不可区别,等价 3 {1,2,5}{3,4} {6,7,} {1,2}b {1,2} {5}b {1,2,5}可区别,划分 4 {1,2}{5}{3,4} {6,7} {1}a {3,4} {2}a {3,4} {1}b {1,2} {2}b {1,2} {1,2}不可区别,等价 2.构造以下文法相应的最小的DFA S→ 0A|1B A→ 1S|1 B→0S|0 正规式:   B=0S+0   A=1S+1   S=0(1S+1)+1(0S+0)=01S+01+10S+10=(01+10)S+(01+10)=(01|10)*(01|10) NFA: 最小化DFA:    3.自上而下语法分析,回溯产生的原因是什么? 原因:文法的产生式有问题 4.P100 练习4,反复提取公共左因子。 S→C$ C→bA|aB A→a|aC|bAA B→b|bC|aBB

第九次作业

独自空忆成欢 提交于 2019-12-03 22:59:18
1.将DFA最小化:教材P65 第9题 最小化DFA:      正规式:b*a(c|ad)*bb* 2.构造以下文法相应的最小的DFA S→ 0A|1B A→ 1S|1 B→0S|0 正规文法转化为正规式: S = 0(1S + 1) + 1(0S + 0)  = 01S + 01 + 10S + 10  = (01 + 10)S + (01 + 10)  =(01 + 10)*(01 + 10)  =(01 | 10)*(01 | 10) 3.自上而下语法分析,回溯产生的原因是什么?   文法的产生式出现了问题。 4.P100 练习4,反复提取公共左因子。 S -> C$ C -> bA | aB A -> aD | bAA B -> bE | aBB D -> C | ε E -> C | ε 来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/rushB/p/11810478.html

boost string matching DFA

南楼画角 提交于 2019-12-03 21:20:14
问题 Given a string I have to test whether that ends with a known set of suffixes. Now as the the of suffixes are not very small and every word in the document has to be checked against that list of known suffixes. Every character in the word and suffix is char32_t . As a naive iterative matching will be expensive. Though most of the suffixes are not sub suffix or prefix of another suffix, most of them are constructed with a small set of characters. Most of the checks will be a miss rather than

DFA最小化,语法分析初步

这一生的挚爱 提交于 2019-12-03 20:39:31
1.将DFA最小化:教材P65 第9题 2.构造以下文法相应的最小的DFA S→ 0A|1B A→ 1S|1 B→0S|0 3.自上而下语法分析,回溯产生的原因是什么?   文法产生有问题 4.P100 练习4,反复提取公共左因子。 S → C$ C → bA|aB A → a | aC | bAA B → b | bC | aBB 答: S → C$ C → bA | aB A → aD | bAA B → bE | aBB D → ε | C E → ε | C 来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/chenjd/p/11796519.html