commit

问题 Is it possible to prevent the web.config file from being committed when doing an SVN commit? I have the following SVN Global ignore pattern set, but it still doesn't prevent it. If I replace "*.config" with "web.config" it still doesn't prevent it. http://screencast.com/t/fLKoZhYykYG Global ignore pattern: *.o *.lo *.la *.al .libs *.so *.so.[0-9]* *.a *.pyc *.pyo *.rej *~ #*# .#* .*.swp .DS_Store */bin */obj bin obj aspnet_client *.tmp */legacy legacy *.suo *.user *.config ===================

问题 i have been developing committing on the master branch, and would like to move all commits beyond the "initial commit" to a separate development branch, and keep the master for release versions. right now, my tree looks like this: master: A - B - C - D - E - F i would like it to look like this: development: B - C - D - E - F / master: A ----------------- that way i would be able to merge a release like so: development: B - C - D - E - F --- X / \ master: A ----------------------- Y can

问题 How does one "group a bunch of revisions you've already committed to svn together" (see Jim T's answer) in Trac? 回答1: The very basic idea is simply to put a bug number into the revision log when you commit. If it's the first thing, then when you look down the logs you'll be able to see the bug numbers easily. I know Redmine has an additional feature that checks for these bug numbers in the commit logs and attaches the revision to the bug, so you can see from the bug all the revisions that

问题 I have a scenario where I have a repo where users access the files directly, they don't know git exists, and make changes to what are essentially text files. I have that repo cloned. So when a commit is made, the changes are pushed to the cloned repo using the post-commit hook. Now, I have the cloned repo as a bare repo. But, what I would like to do at this point is have a script run each time a push is made. That script would read the content of the file(s) that were just pushed. Is that

问题 Good day, This is an update to my old post at SQL Simultaneous transactions ignore each other's locks??? DEADLOCK [InnoDB, Python], as I realized later that the issue had nothing to do with what I thought the problem was. I'm trying to create the MySQL equivilent to a T-SQL based script for a client. I have two identical scripts, Alice and Barry running concurrently. Their goal is to SELECT * FROM job WHERE status = 0 LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE UPDATE job SET status = 1 where jobIDs match, do some

问题 I got an oracle db 10g, here a table as an example create table Dienstplan ( Montag Number(2), Dienstag Number(2), Mittwoch Number (2), Donnerstag Number (2), Freitag Number (2), Samstag Number (2), Sonntag Number (2), gueltigAb DATE default SYSDATE NOT NULL, PersonalNr Number(10) references Mitarbeiter(PersonalNr) INITIALLY DEFERRED DEFERRABLE, PRIMARY KEY (PersonalNr, gueltigAb), check (Montag <= 24), check (Dienstag <= 24), check (Mittwoch <= 24), check (Donnerstag <= 24), check (Freitag <

问题 This may sound like a very basic question to some of you but I am new to subversion and would like your advice on this question: How should I handle a large commit that took several days of work to code if person B also modified and committed his changes before me? His commit concerned the same files as me. To sum up, here is the workflow: Commit A based on rev.1, not pushed yet Commit B based on rev.0, already pushed, creating rev.2 Is it risky to push commit A given the amount of code that

问题 I have created a new commit, but forgot to pull before that. (I should have used git stash and than git pull .) Now if I git pull , I get an additional commit "merge origin/<branch> to <branch>" (Some commits have already been pushed by some other colleagues.), which I don't want. Is there any way to do git pull without merging? 回答1: git pull is essentially git fetch followed by git merge , so if you want a pull without the merge, just do git fetch . 回答2: If you already did that commit

问题 I used git to commit changes in my repository, followed these steps git add . git commit -m "message" but noticed a clone of the file where changes were made also present in the repository new file had ' ~ ' symbol appended at the end. why did this happen ? And how can I prevent it in the future ? Also some thoughts on how to remove the file with "~" would be great Thanks 回答1: Your editor is generating backup files of the form FILENAME~. (Emacs does this; it can be persuaded otherwise.) You

问题 I've forked a project on GIT, and started contributing. From what I've understood, that project has a pending pull request at the time I cloned the project, and later that commit of a 3rd person was refused by the project owner. I've done my change (adding a single new file), and I wanted to push it to the master branch of the project. So I've pushed it to my github master branch, and then I wanted to make a pull request. In case I'm not clear, I've done this: Clone the project add a file &